Dee D. Flint wrote: 
 "Jack Twilley"  wrote in message 
 ... 
 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- 
Hash: SHA1 
 
 
"Mike" == Mike Coslo  writes: 
 
Mike With the likely demise of Morse code testing, is there any 
Mike reason to have contests give double the points for Morse code 
Mike contacts? 
 
Jack How is the presence or absence of Morse code testing related to 
Jack the point multiplier for Morse code contacts?  They're 
Jack orthogonal, as far as I can tell. 
 
Mike I was always told that the increased points offered was an 
Mike encouragement to work CW. 
 
That doesn't really answer the question.  A Technician can send CW on 
certain HF bands, even without a higher-class license-holder present. 
A ham with any other license can work phone contacts.  Therefore, 
whether or not an amateur has passed a Morse code test has nothing to 
do with woether or not they can use Morse code.  Even if the 
multiplier is to provide encouragement to use Morse code, it still 
doesn't have anything to do with whether or not hams are tested. 
 
Now, if you're going to assert that the potential end to Morse code 
testing will eventually cause hams to stop learning and/or using Morse 
code, and that therefore the multiplier is akin to the "marriage 
penalty" [1], well, I'm not sure that's true.  If it is, NCI should be 
raising holy hell about the pro-code conspiracy behind all these 
contests, right? 
 
[...] 
 
Mike I've seen a number of cases where a phone operator has worked 
Mike hard and logged a lot of QSO's, only to be beaten by a CW op 
Mike with little more than half that number. 
 
Jack And how hard did that CW op work? 
 
Mike I doubt twice as hard as the Phone person. 
 
You could measure it yourself, you know.  Work two similar contests 
(say, two of the QSO parties coming up soon).  Operate solely in phone 
for the first contest.  Score your points and keep track of your 
experience with notes or something.  Operate solely in CW for the 
second contest.  Do the same sort of scoring and note-taking.  Report 
back to the group with your personal experience. 
 
When I know the code, I'll do the same thing, if only to satisfy my 
own curiosity. 
 
Mike - Mike KB3EIA - 
 
Jack. 
 
 
 Actually Jack, that would not be quite a fair measurement.  The CW op has 
 put in many hours of practicing and participating in contests to get his/her 
 speed up to a really useful contest level.  Although the phone op has also 
 put in hours participating in contests to get his/her abilities honed to 
 contest level, it is far fewer hours than the CW op to get to the top levels 
 of ability.  So the double points, at least to me, also acknowledges the 
 longer preparatory stage that it takes to get good at it. 
 
hmmmm, I have to disagree somewhat. 
 
This is kind of putting CW on a pedestal. Let's take FD as an example. 
 
I spend a lot of time planning, putting up antennas and tents and hours 
and hours of operating. Some of our CW ops help in this effort also, 
including the hardest working one out of the bunch. But some others 
simply show up and work a few hours, then go home. 
 
The point is, if you give extra points because of effort involved, then 
you have to decide what constitutes "effort". 
 
 
 
 
 
 In the contests in which I've participated, I have noticed that the best CW 
 ops can usually run more stations in less time because of the need for fewer 
 repeats than the best phone ops. 
 
I have been amazed how quickly they can run. Humbled in fact. Adn I 
think that kind of flies in the face of those that say that CW is slower 
to work in a contest than SSB. 
 
 
  On the other hand, less experienced people 
 can run phone contacts faster than CW contacts. 
 
If you compare the person to them self, that is true. 
 
 
 
 
 
 In my own contesting experience, my all time high was 310 contacts and it 
 was a CW contest.  My second best was down around 150 contacts and it was a 
 voice contest.  I'm running only 100 watts and wire antennas.  I found it 
 much easier to break through pileups and bad conditions on CW.  But it took 
 time to learn CW. 
 
But it took some time to learn just how to put a station together too. 
 
I'll defend testing CW, and I've been willing to put in a lot of effort 
to take my CW abilities to the "he stinks" level. But it sure seems like 
an unnatural advantage to have double points. 
 
- mike KB3EIA - 
 
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 |