Cecil's Math
			 
			 
			
		
		
		
			
			Cecil, 
W5DXP wrote: 
"Steven Best says that total re-reflection is a fallacy. Do you disagree 
with Dr. Best?" 
 
I`ll play along. On this issue, Dr. Best may be mistaken. Individual 
testimonies may not be very reliable, but large numbers become a 
preponderence of evidence. Numbers of operators claim to be able to 
reach near 1:1 SWR at their transmitter outputs while having greater 
SWR`s in other parts of their transmission systems. I believe them. It 
agrees with my own experience. The 1:1 SWR at the transmitter means 
reflections were stopped short of their return to the transmitter. 
Re-reflection at the match point is therefore very near total. 
 
I have similar practical experience that transmitter systems can be 
adjusted to reject returnng reflections in many cases. Reg used to 
explain such rejection by an assumed very high transmitter output 
impedance, if my recollection is correct. If I misquoted Reg in any way 
it is unintentional. I disagree with the common opinion that classical 
plate resistance has much to do with transmitter output impedance. In my 
opinion, output conductance is proportional to the switched-on time of 
the final amplifier. Conduction angle controls impedance, which is much 
lower than plate resistance. 
 
So why doesn`t the transmitter take back reflected power? The impedance 
bump is needed as a catalyst to cause a re-reflection. The re-reflection 
is as my professors said over 50 years ago due to the fact that the 
transmitter already has a surplus of energy. Energy always flows on a 
line from a surplus to a dearth, and not vice versa. 
 
A tapering charge battery charger undergoes an amperage subsidence as a 
battery becomes charged. Even were the charger another battery as in the 
case of a jump-start, energy doesn`t flow from a lower potential battery 
to the higher potential battery. 
 
A-C sources behave much the same. The greater-magnitude source 
outsupplies the other and determines the direction of current flow when 
the sources are facing-off against each other. 
 
Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI 
 
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 |