RadioBanter - View Single Post - Able Baker Charlie (or is that Avacado Bascule Cumquat?)

June 17th 04, 01:38 AM

In article , PAMNO
(N2EY) writes:

In article , Mike Coslo
writes:

N2EY wrote:
In article , Mike Coslo
writes:

N2EY wrote:

There are all sorts of reasons to be involved in a newsgroup. Some of
us like to post to exchange knowledge, some to debate, and others to
have an adventure - using other posters as pro or antagonists in a sort
of text based adventure game.

Lots of other reasons, too. One can only speculate on Mr. Anderson's reasons.
;-)

Speculate away, Rev. Jim, in the most "civil" negative connotations
your lil imagination thunk up...:-)

Speculate until all you see are speckles...

Of course we can all speculate on Mr. Miccolis' reasons (to sound off
like some latter-day "T.O.M.") when that ARRL president-for-life
ceased mortal existance long before Rev. Jim got is first Good Book
(ARRL Handbook, that is).

With the different personalities involved, the games can get pretty
interesting and funny, or sometimes they can become boring and
repetitive. The MARS is Ham radio stuff is a good example of the latter.

No it isn't.*

If you are trying to be "with-it" (of two decades plus ago), try to
remember that everyone is NOT a Monty Python fan... :-)

Face it, he is good at it.

Not really. I have seen many other posters get the better of Mr. Anderson.
It's not hard to do at all.

Tsk, tsk, tsk...your Python was gored and you think everyone else's
was, too? :-)

All I've done is present a differing opinion than his, and point out some of
his mistakes. His responses have been - predictable.

BS, Rev. Jim. You've got a bad habit of trying to convince others
that you "know" things you can't verify. Tsk, tsk, tsk.

It's fascinating how a few words of a different opinion can cause Mr. Anderson
to produce volumes of verbiage. And how a calm, polite correction of even one
of his errors brings such a torrent of anger and abuse.

"Torrent of anger and abuse?!?!?" :-)

Poor baby. Wanting to be the hall monitor in here, ey?

Jimmah, da Google is NOT your friend in this case. :-)

It may not be what you are in here for, but
he succeeds in his game.

Sometimes.

More times than not. I'm still here... :-)

Note this does not apply to the strange fringe postings that appear to
be personal battles, such as the one that Dave seems involved in with
some hams in his locale. That is just really wierd stuff.

Just different versions of the same game. And the "game" sometimes extends
beyond the newsgroup. For example, some time back I and some others received
several unsolicited emails from Mr. Anderson, with attachments that were
allegedly pictures. I deleted them unopened, as is standard procedure for
unsolicited attachments. I found out later they were supposedly a picture of
his commercial radiotelephone license and a picture that included adult male
nudity. Of course this is second hand information because I simply deleted the
emails, but you have to kinda wonder why such Mr. Anderson would send me such
things.

Oh, dear. Isn't the nasty old Reverend getting out of hand with his
preachy moralizing? :-)

"Male nudity!" :-)

By accident, a JPG of an aerial photo of a converted B-26 with one of
the crew mooning the photo plane in the nose is considered "male
nudity!!!"

Several of the folks who are in here thought it was FUNNY.

But, the rigid moral majority, more self-righteous than mental
viagra overdosing, say it is "male nudity!!!" Good grief.
Grow up. Get a new fig leaf to cover your anguish...

If you had bothered to Google (your constant source of diss-material)
you would have found out the sequence of events was totally in public
in this venue.

By the way, I DID send the correct attachment which was, indeed, a
scan of my FIRST First Class Radiotelephone (Commercial) license.
I've had several of those licenses, all the way to the change-over to
the General Radiotelephone Operator license class.

You
(or anyone here) know what will happen when you rise to the bait, you
know pretty much what the resulting exchange will be, and yet it is
irresistable.

Naw, it's totally resistible. And predictable.

And yet you are now involved once more!

Only by choice.

Yes, "Mr. Miccolis" wants to keep on beating dead horses until they
die all over again to prove his point that He was "correct," and all
must accept that lest they get caught in an endless loop of Rev. Jim
preaching his self-righteousness. "Mr. Miccolis" can do no wrong,
ever, and he is compelled to repeat old arguments forever and ever
to demonstrate that.

"Mr. Miccolis" will try to repeat many ancient arguments, discussions,
et al, long after they quit being topics. Why? Apparently "Mr. Miccolis"
can't let sleeping dogs lie nor can he let beaten horses die, either.

It's sort of like watching re-runs of "Wheel of Fortune" (or any other quiz
show on TV) and hoping a guest will come up with a different answer! :-)

Tsk, tsk, tsk...such sore losers! :-)

LHA / WMD