View Single Post
  #4   Report Post  
Old June 20th 04, 11:19 PM
Len Over 21
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , PAMNO
(N2EY) writes:

In article ,

(Len Over 21) writes:

In article ,


(N2EY) writes:

In article ,


(Len Over 21) writes:

In article ,

(N2EY) writes:


Not in the mid- to late-1950s, senior. :-)

Exactly. When you were in Japan, there weren't even any Bear bombers in
service.


Okay, on the basis for one wrong statement, you mount an "air"
assault? :-)


Nope.

On the basis of a whole pattern of your errors, I point them out. ;-)


Sounds like nursie after the remedial English classes.

"WHOLE *PATTERN* OF ERRORS!!!"

:-)

Billions and billions served? Tsk, tsk, tsk...

Rev. Jimmie Who mounts the antenna and transmits a Sermon.

Meanwhile, I thought this thread to be about Phonetic Alphabets.

Must be the "new" English.

It's really about some angry extra trying to get even for losing
arguments in here years ago.

Yawn.

Rev. Jimmie Who is very predictable in that he WILL bring up
old arguments time and again.

We readers aren't sure exactly WHAT will be brought up and
WHEN...and that lends a bit of suspense to the proceedings.

Okay, so Rev. Jimmie Who says this thread is "not" about
phonetic alphabets.

In that case, "Able Baker Charlie" (in the subject field) must
be about some skilled baker with the given name of Charles.

THAT doesn't have much to do with amateur radio, let alone
amateur radio policy, does it?

Rev. Jimmie Who, you are becoming more cryptic every
day.

Reminder: FCC sayeth amateur communications must not
contain encryption or anything intended to obscure meanings.

The 'mean' of "meanings" is obscured, but still visible.

So...tell us about YOUR days in military communications?

Or civilian communications (other than amateur)?

LHA / WMD