Len,

The purpose was, obviously, to let eveyone know what we knew in the first
place - BPL *will* cause interference. Whatever you may think, this will
also cause interference to low band VHF users as well. I shan't get into
who uses that.


Best regards from Rochester, NY
Jim AA2QA


"Len Over 21" wrote in message
...
In article ,
(N2EY) writes:

http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2004/06/28/2/?nc=1

Kudos to W0SR, ARRL, and all involved.

The major "kudos" ought to go to the Cedar Rapids team that put
together an excellent picture of a detailed example of their BPL
test system. One can see it in several Comments on docket
04-37 at the FCC ECFS.

"Kudos to ARRL?" Why? The Cedar Rapids amateur club
did all the work...had the calibrated instruments for valid data
collection. No computer simulations there. Actual on-air tests.

If someone wants to express gratitude to "all involved," the names
and callsigns are in the several 04-37 Comments of the last week.
Write them DIRECT, don't assume that "all" read this din of
inequity called a newsgroup.




---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.712 / Virus Database: 468 - Release Date: 6/27/04