View Single Post
  #20   Report Post  
Old July 6th 04, 06:38 PM
Len Over 21
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , PAMNO
(N2EY) writes:

In article ,

(Len Over 21) writes:

In article ,


(N2EY) writes:

In article ,


(Len Over 21) writes:

In article ,

(N2EY) writes:

In article ,

(Len Over 21) writes:

Oddly enough, despite the urban myth of some objecting to BPL,
the FCC does NOT have any power to stop Access BPL!

Actually, they do.

NO, they don't have ANY ability to STOP any Access BPL.

Yes, they do. FCC has the authority to shut down a source of interference.

All the FCC can do - at the moment and in what they will probably
have on a new R&O - is the ability to stop INCIDENTAL RF
RADIATION beyond the level established by the Commission.

Or if it causes harmful interference.

The broadband communications service over Access BPL can
CONTINUE in the USA.

Only with FCC approval. FCC also regulates communications by "wire" as well

as
radio. That's why a "56K" modem can't go quite that fast.


Nope. No "FCC approval" required as long as Access BPL doesn't
have incidental RF radiation beyond Commission regulations.

You best reread the Telecommunications Act of 1996.


Why?


For one thing, you MIGHT learn something new. :-)

Just think...you could then be the Informed Guru preaching to the
masses in r.r.a.p. all about how they should act, do, perform, etc.

But...all you really seem to want to do in here is do lengthy
arguments for the sake of arguments' sake. :-)

Sorry, Jimmie, but you are wasting lots of folks' time...

Now go back to orbit and tell us all about SPACE and your
intimate knowledge of the aerospace industry, etc. That's a
regular feature in here and your sidekicks don't want to miss a
single minute of it...

Good luck on your new job as a traveling salesman.