Jim Kelley wrote:

Cecil Moore wrote:
You have argued loud
and long that current phase has nothing to do with current direction.

If that's what you think, then you misunderstood.

Would you like for me to re-post your posting where you said phase
had nothing to do with direction? When you change your mind about
something, it would be nice if you were man enough to admit it.
Saying that you already knew everything that will ever be known
is getting pretty old.

I also
note that you no longer say the current into the bottom of the coil is
greater than the current our of the top of the coil.

OK, I will repeat that the current into the bottom of the coil is
greater than the current out of the top of the coil (during the
1/2 cycle when they are both positive). The words in parentheses
are always implied by convention when talking about something like
this but you already knew that. Please don't tell me that the hard
time you have been giving me was over an implied semantic context that
everyone already understands is a standard accepted convention.

Those currents are not standing still.

Never said current stands still, Cecil.

Would you like for me to re-post your posting that says the standing
wave current doesn't move and never enters the coil? You said because
that was true, I didn't understand standing waves.

They are flowing
in and out of the coil and have been proven not to be equal by actual
measurements.

Exactly what I've been saying ...

Now everyone can see that you are just flat out lying. You insisted that
standing wave current does not flow into a coil and argued with me when
I said it did. Hint for you, Jim: The current cannot flow in and out
without first flowing in, which you asserted doesn't happen.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----