Len Over 21 wrote:
In article , Mike Coslo writes:


N2EY wrote:

Mike Coslo wrote in message

...

1. Most everything is done that way today.

Doesn't make it right!


Make a question pool large enough, and there is no problem.


Sure there is.

I dunno, Jim. I can read a book, or I can look at a question pool. It's


all the same to me. If you make questions up, you have to have a
reference for them someplace. Is it in a book? fine, study the book
then. Is it a question pool? Fine also.

Rote memorization? Seriously if anyone rote memorizes the General and
Extra tests, they are very intelligent and very stupid at the same time.
And they will have a few curves thrown at them at test time.


Mike, the Regulations on privatized testing always specified a
MINIMUM of ten questions for every required question on a test,
amateur or commercial.

Well there we go! Some 800 questions (maybe more) are in the present
Extra pool. I just did a BOE calculation from a QP PDF (what the world
needs is more acronyms, eh?)

The test question pools were generated for the least amount of
lawful effort. For amateur tests the VEC QPC is responsible.

The amateur QP could have a hundred times the required questions
and the total would defeat all the "charges" of "not right" just from
the immensity of a memorization effort. [for all but the eidetic]

Increasing the QP size is perfectly legal under the law. :-)


A thought: If a question pool is cheating, then a book with the answers


in the test in the course of reading is cheating too

Question pools don't equal cheating unless they are supposed to be
secret.


So...

The only way that *some* Hams will be happy is if the test questions
have answers in no book - that is to say that all testing will have to
be in the form of basic research - the new ham will have to advance the
state of the art in his/her admission test.

bwaaahaahaa


Otherwise the new ham is cheating and isn't as good as the old ham. 8^)

(I just recently had to listen to an old timer in person on a tirade
about the worthless new hams - again.)

Why did you have to listen? I find turning on my heel and walking away
does wonders. Or, looking the ranter straight in the eye and saying,
"You're just wrong...." (lookit how the oldest ranter here on rrap
reacts to being told he's wrong - which he often is....)

Well, it wasn't a case where I could or should have turned away. I
supposed I could have kicked the person out, but I also needed the help
he was giving on a task. Real life has a habit of modifying our
behavior. Plus ut wasn't a personal attack. Most hams I know think I'm a
relative old timer. But its still irritating.


It's not a question of longevity with Rev. Jim. He Is Right and won't
accept anything contrary to His Sacred Vision. :-)

It boils down to the OFs elevating themselves far out of reality on
"how good they were/are" in the way of the Sacred Olde Tests. If
They did it, it is "right." If it isn't done as They did it, it is "wrong."

That's the bottom line in all of these test issues. :-)



Hams - old and new - didn't change the exam procedures. Neither did
ARRL, NCI, NCVEC or any other ham group. FCC did, because it saved
them resources.

We aren't going to a system other than multiple-choice
published-Q&A-pool exams in the foreseeable future. Just not gonna
happen.

Just a thought here... If we were to say, go to a book oriented
reference for the tests, I can assure you that it would be no better
than the pool based system. Thousands and thousands of college students
prove this on a daily basis, pulling all-nighters, cramming to take
their tests. All the crammed knowledge is placed in shirt term memory,
to quickly fade after the test is over.


Mike, amateur radio is "different." It is different because the OF's
tests were the "correct way" to do it. :-)

Never mind that multiple-choice testing is accepted nearly
everywhere else (even done in the Sacred Olde Tests) by
academics and government agencies.

Amateur radio is not a hobby. It is much, much more that that to
the OFs. It is a "service." It has "unchangeable" rules that must be
kept always and forever the same lest it become "incorrect." :-)

Well, I *do* get pretty excited over it, and am having a lot of fun.

Another poster has apparently just learned that COLEMs (the
commercial test givers) "also have question pools!" Amazing.
It's been that way since privatized testing began. But, it was just
noticed! [anyone can look in the first bound volume of Title 47 and
see the commercial license requirements except nothing about
that or the three middle volumes are mentioned much in ham
radio places...that has "nothing to do with hamme raddio!" yell the
purists...:-) ]

At Barnes and Noble the other day I saw an electrician licensing
question pool. Seems what they do is important and they need to know
what they are doing.

The anti-public-question-pool purists don't have much of validity
in their "memorization" charges...but it's about the only one they
can come up with...so they must push and push on that to justify
their public words. :-)

BTW, that surprise I noted for anyone that *was* stupid enough to rote
memorize the Extra pool is that the ABCD order of the answers is
sometimes switched. That would almost certainly throw the person off
balance if they didn't actually know the material.