Good for you Cecil. Brevity and to the point is so much better than a
personal monologue about unrelated subjects that one would expect from a
drunk .
Regards
Art.


"Cecil Moore" wrote in message
...
Richard Harrison wrote:

Art, KB9MZ wrote:
"The dipole is a very inefficient radiator."

I seem to remember Kraus saying 95% efficiency was not unusual as a
dipole efficiency.

I don't think that's the efficiency that Art is talking about. Art's
efficiency seems to be defined as the power delivered to the receiver
divided by the power sourced by the transmitter.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----