Thread
:
ARRL to propose subband-by-bandwidth regulation
View Single Post
#
23
August 19th 04, 07:07 PM
William
Posts: n/a
(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ...
Subject: ARRL to propose subband-by-bandwidth regulation
From:
(William)
Date: 8/19/2004 7:34 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id:
(N2EY) wrote in message
...
In article ,
(Brian Kelly) writes:
"KØHB" wrote in message
thlink.net...
"N2EY" wrote
- No CW-only subbands
There never have been any "CW-only" subbands on HF.
That's true - but there should be!
Odd, when I was first licensed I could only use CW on 80, 40, 15, and 10M.
Wonder what kind of subbands those were?
Narrow band modes, Brainless Twerp, in as much as Conditionals, Generals,
Advanced and Extras could STILL exercise the full breadth of thier privileges
there.
Is this the part where The World's Greatest DXer comes in and mentions
that you consistently spell "thier" incorrectly?
You guys are so predictable.
The NOVICES may ahve been limited to using only CW, however NONE of those
"subbands" was restricted to CW only.
Never.
"Ahven't" they?
They were to Novices.
btw, anybody who says "CW is dead" should take a look at the ARRL 160 m
contest
scores.
73 de Jim, N2EY
What was your score?
What was YOURS? (More logbooks locked away, no doubt........)
What was yours?
Reply With Quote
