RadioBanter - View Single Post

August 22nd 04, 08:07 PM

In article ,
(Quitefine) writes:

In article ,
(William) writes:

And for what it's worth, have you noticed that we used to have an ANON
poster on here going by the "handle" of Quitefine?

Why do you write of
us in the past tense?

Steve has an
unnatural attraction for every ANON poster on here EXCEPT for
Quitefine.

It seems that 'Steve' is
not the only one :-) :-)

You and Lenover21 have both
tried to be anonymous here.
You have not had a problem
with others' anonymity, as
long as they agreed with you.

Jimmie, why do you LIE?

I've never tried to "hide in an anyonymity" in here. My postings are
clearly MINE. But, you have the audacity to assume an UNSIGNED
anonymity and then chide others about it. Tsk, tsk, tsk.

You have no problem with the
anonymity of "Leo" or "Vipul".

But in our case, you are far
more interested in who we
are than in what we have to say.

That is very interesting.

What? Is your real identity Spock from the Star Trek original series/

Spock always said "interesting." :-)

Can you explain this?

No.

Perhaps 'Steve' respects our
anonymity. Perhaps he has
changed.

Perhaps JPM thinks he can get away with this?

Can you explain why you
respect only the anonymity of
those who agree with you?

Can you explain why you
seek to aggravate someone
you have described as "nuts"?

Nuts is how nursie
acts.

Nobody needs shrink school
diplomas to observe
irrationality.

Why is Rev. Jim hiding behind
anyonymity?

Backbone broken?

Tsk.

LHA / WMD