RadioBanter - View Single Post

August 24th 04, 07:55 AM

In article ,
(Len Over 21) writes:

In article ,
(Quitefine) writes:

In article ,
(William) writes:

And for what it's worth, have you noticed that we used to have an ANON
poster on here going by the "handle" of Quitefine?

Why do you write of
us in the past tense?

Steve has an
unnatural attraction for every ANON poster on here EXCEPT for
Quitefine.

It seems that 'Steve' is
not the only one :-) :-)

You and Lenover21 have both
tried to be anonymous here.
You have not had a problem
with others' anonymity, as
long as they agreed with you.

Jimmie, why do you LIE?

Whom do you address, Len?

I've never tried to "hide in an anyonymity" in here.

Yes, you have.
"not that there's anything
wrong with that" ;-)

My postings are
clearly MINE.

Many if not most of
them, until recently,
did not contain your
name, callsign or
other identification.

And you have used at
least six different screen
names in this newsgroup.

The conclusion is obvious.

But, you have the audacity to assume an UNSIGNED
anonymity and then chide others about it. Tsk, tsk, tsk.

We have not "chided" anyone
for wishing to be anonymous.

You have no problem with the
anonymity of "Leo" or "Vipul".

But in our case, you are far
more interested in who we
are than in what we have to say.

That is very interesting.

What? Is your real identity Spock from the Star Trek original series/

Spock always said "interesting." :-)

Why does our anonymity
bother you so much, but not the
anonymity of "Shah101" and "Leo"?

Could it be you have a ....double standard?

Can you explain why you
respect only the anonymity of
those who agree with you?

Can you explain why you
seek to aggravate someone
you have described as "nuts"?

Nuts is how
nursie
acts.

If you think that,
why do you aggravate him?

Nobody needs shrink school
diplomas to observe
irrationality.

Let us hold this mirror for you, Len...;-)