View Single Post
  #400   Report Post  
Old August 24th 04, 10:38 PM
Len Over 21
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
(Notfine Miccolis in PA) writes:

In article ,
(William) writes:

(Quitefine) wrote in message
...
In article ,
(William) writes:

And for what it's worth, have you noticed that we used to have an ANON
poster on here going by the "handle" of Quitefine?

Why do you write of
us in the past tense?


Jimmy like to live in PAST. He now tense.

I wrote of you in the past tense, not us.


You did not answer the
question, which was
'why' you used the past
tense.


Why Jimmy live in PAST so much?

Steve has an
unnatural attraction for every ANON poster on here EXCEPT for
Quitefine.

It seems that 'Steve' is
not the only one :-) :-)

You and Lenover21 have both
tried to be anonymous here.


WRONG. WRONG. WRONG. WRONG.

I merely wished to reduce spam at my original e-mail account, and
it has worked.


You did not clearly
identify yourself.


"Quitefine" big HYPOCRITE. "Quitefine' no ID. No guts. Cowardice
as gunnery sergeant Yell-yell shout. Tsk tsk.

You can and will read nefarious intent into any of my
actions.


Is there something
"nefarious" about
wishing to be
anonymous? We
do not think so.


Jimmy do anonymity and hypocrisy bit. Tsk, tsk. NEFARIOUS!

Regardless, my posting style has not changed and anyone who
asks will be told who I am.


Perhaps. But you
avoid many direct
questions.


What questions?

Anonymouse Quitefine ask questions...get anonymous replies. :-)

Can you explain this?

No.

Perhaps 'Steve' respects our
anonymity. Perhaps he has
changed.


It's that time of the month for gunnery nurses to change uniforms.

Steve only changes when he goes on his meds, and when he goes off
his meds.


You claim that he is "nuts" and
"on meds". If you believe that
to be true, why do you antagonize
him?


Why anonymous Jimmy antagonize everyone else? :-)

Tsk, tsk.