View Single Post
  #420   Report Post  
Old August 26th 04, 03:24 AM
Quitefine
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
(William) writes:

(Quitefine) wrote in message
...
In article ,
(William) writes:

(Quitefine) wrote in message
...
In article ,
(William) writes:

You have no future on RRAP.


You are mistaken.
Here we are.

You and Lenover21 have both
tried to be anonymous here.


You did not clearly
identify yourself.


I didn't intend to fool anyone. I rarely sign off with my name or
call anyway. Haven't for a long time.


Then why do you criticize
others for doing the same thing?

You can and will read nefarious intent into any of my
actions.


Is there something
"nefarious" about
wishing to be
anonymous? We
do not think so.


Steve thinks so, and that's what's important here.


We did not ask Steve.
We asked you.

We ask again:
Is there something
"nefarious" about
wishing to be
anonymous?

You claim that he is "nuts" and
"on meds". If you believe that
to be true, why do you antagonize
him?


Simple. He won't back off.


Neither will you.

He doesn't know how to.


Neither do you, apparently.

His handlers cannot control him.


Whom do you speak of?
Are others somehow
responsible for what he
writes?

He's a menace.


How is he a menace?

And to whom?