Thread
:
ARRL to propose subband-by-bandwidth regulation
View Single Post
#
64
August 26th 04, 09:01 PM
Len Over 21
Posts: n/a
In article ,
(gunnery nurse Yell-yell, shouting from an emotional high) writes:
Subject: ARRL to propose subband-by-bandwidth regulation
From:
(Brian)
Date: 8/25/2004 3:10 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:
(N2EY) wrote in message
...
But for me the important question is: Should there be CW-only subbands? I
say
yes - about the lowest 15-20% of each HF/MF hamband. Including 160.
Why not? Would it really bother anyone if 3500-3575 and 7000-7050 were CW
only?
Only if it were to include all other "digital" (hi,hi) modes...
As it is, CW is allowed in ALL MF/HF -amateur- spectrum.
As it is, Brian, do you understand WHY it's allowed?
NURSIE ask a no-brainer question.
Easy answer: Olde-Tyme Hammes at ARRL lobby for morsemanship,
get it. FCC not care much, takes easy way out and gives in to ARRL.
That was in the past (where "Quitefine" hangs out...).
Things are changing with more and more citizens able to lobby the
FCC without having to join special interest groups. Changes are
coming....
Will NURSIE be able to change with the times?
Will NURSIE be able to change anything...including uniforms? :-)
Will NURSIE ever get proper credentials as a homo sapiens?
Reply With Quote
