Thread
:
ARRL to propose subband-by-bandwidth regulation
View Single Post
#
67
August 27th 04, 01:16 AM
William
Posts: n/a
(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ...
Subject: ARRL to propose subband-by-bandwidth regulation
From:
(Brian)
Date: 8/25/2004 3:10 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:
(N2EY) wrote in message
...
But for me the important question is: Should there be CW-only subbands? I
say
yes - about the lowest 15-20% of each HF/MF hamband. Including 160.
Why not? Would it really bother anyone if 3500-3575 and 7000-7050 were CW
only?
Only if it were to include all other "digital" (hi,hi) modes...
As it is, CW is allowed in ALL MF/HF -amateur- spectrum.
As it is, Brian, do you understand WHY it's allowed?
73
Steve, K4YZ
It legasee mode frum when only mode was CW. Dey outlaw sparc. Member?
Reply With Quote
