RadioBanter - View Single Post

August 29th 04, 07:06 PM

In article ,
(Blackguard) writes:

For what insult or name can be
hurled at those who openly
and freely describe
themselves as "blackguard"
and "scoundrel"?

Ahh, the insult may yet be hurled!

Of course. But you have
thwarted many before they
can even be hurled.

But it means nothing. Just as
Lenover21 tries to take my initials as underwear, I must point out
that his would stand for something much smellier - if we lived in a
universe where that meant anything.

Again, "Blackguard" preempts
the attack by showing how empty
of significance it is. How such attacks
reflect more on the attacker than
the attacked.

Simple. Elegant. Brilliant.

Blackguard: the scoundrel

Vox: as in voice of course

Deus: as in deus ex machina.

I am here to help though I am a scoundrel and paradox.

Few words, but well chosen.

You are a NOTHING in soiled underwear.

No, I am something for sure.

But, you and this "Quitefine" deserve each other.

We take that as praise, bordering
on flattery.

Come to think of it, maybe you two are the SAME?

Ahh, yes! I may be Quitefine. I may be Jim, and I might even be
Lenover21! Only myself and the individuals in question know.

For sure. You may also be any
one of many, many others.

You may even be more than one
person, writing under a single name.

We note the failed attempts to
avoid what you have to say, and to
divert the discussion to who you
are. As if that matters.

The word is all important. I speak the truth.

We are yet to detect even one
iota of untruth in your statements.

Does one take bad advice from a named person over good advice given
anonymously?

No one with any sense does that.
But even common sense is a
rare commodity to some.

Who is the fool?

But no, I am

Blackguard Vox Deus

Paradoxically!

Be well and happy

As should you!

We are.

remaining at your service,
I am

Blackguard Vox Deus

With the company of
such scoundrels,
we would avoid the
self-proclaimed
virtuous.