Thread
:
Canadian No Code Proposal Open For Comment
View Single Post
#
1
September 9th 04, 03:03 AM
Quitefine
Posts: n/a
In article ,
(William) writes:
(Quitefine) wrote in message
...
In article ,
(Len Over 21) writes:
By the way, since your Lordship doesn't understand it, I'm NOT
itching to get that mighty Nobel-quality amateur license...I'm just
trying to argue for the elimination of the morse code test for any
radio operator license.
Why?
If you have no interest in
becoming a radio amateur,
why do you attempt to
change the rules?
Every American should have an interest in increasing the number of
potential emergency radio operators.
A valid point.
However, Len does not
agree that amateur radio plays
any significant role in emergency
communications.
You just never know when you
might need one,
If so, why have any tests at all? Or
why have tests beyond the absolute
minimum possible?
and Morse Code just isn't needed to be an effective
emergency radio operator.
Morse Code has had a role
in some emergency communications
recently. These are well documented
by people who participated.
However, to claim that every
radio amateur must be tested on Morse
Code because there might someday be
a need to use it in an emergency is quite
a stretch of credibility.
It is clear that Len's interest goes far beyond
eliminating the Morse Code test.\
To quote a wise one:
"It is not the Morse, but the hatred"
Reply With Quote