Len Over 21 wrote:

In article , Mike Coslo
writes:


William wrote:


Mike Coslo wrote in message

...


I'm merely amused by the lack of consistency with which Steve
approaches the anonymii.

Call it PCTA double standard if you will - all perfectly acceptable on
RRAP.

You are taking in the data, and coming to the wrong conclusion.


No. Brian isn't reaching the conclusion YOU want.

I don't care *what* conclusion Brian reaches. I will call it wrong tho'.


It isn't the base content but the underlying tone which gets the
response. I simply look at Steve as a feedback generator. Feedback is
derived from input, as it were.


Classic case of a servo loop with too much gain...results in
oscillation and instability.

Nursie's loop filter is way off what it should be. More oscillation.


You shouldn't be too mean to him - you *need* his feedback. Heck your
fishing expeditions wouldn't be half as much fun without him here.


The objections to Quitefine and Blackguard are their anonymity, not
their content. Okay. Your answer to all their questions is "you're
anonymous"


Tsk.

it a Task it, eh? 8^)

The anonymousies are NOT INVOLVED! No ID, nothing. [see the
commands uff das uber-oberst...]

So what. non-involvement isn't an issue with me. Note that I post to
you? Last time I checked, Dave didn't control me.

yelling across the room Hey Dave, do you control what I post?


Clever answer, that! And not an answer at all.


You've not made any "answer" in your posting. Nothing at all.

Umm, it was his answer, and a comment by me.

But you knew that, eh?

What you've demonstrated is just another item in the becoming-
clear PCTA extra Double Standard: Anyone attacking NCTAs
is "OK." Anyone against PCTA extras should be forbidden
everything. :-)

Who's attacking anyone? Paraaanoiia!

- Mike KB3EIA -