In article , Mike Coslo
writes:

Len Over 21 wrote:

In article , Mike Coslo
writes:

William wrote:

Mike Coslo wrote in message

...

I'm merely amused by the lack of consistency with which Steve
approaches the anonymii.

Call it PCTA double standard if you will - all perfectly acceptable on
RRAP.

You are taking in the data, and coming to the wrong conclusion.

No. Brian isn't reaching the conclusion YOU want.

I don't care *what* conclusion Brian reaches. I will call it wrong tho'.

Ach zo! Good old PCTA extra Double Standard invoked! :-)

If it isn't to your liking it is "wrong?"

Of course. You don't like it so therefore it is "wrong." :-)

It isn't the base content but the underlying tone which gets the
response. I simply look at Steve as a feedback generator. Feedback is
derived from input, as it were.

Classic case of a servo loop with too much gain...results in
oscillation and instability.

Nursie's loop filter is way off what it should be. More oscillation.

You shouldn't be too mean to him - you *need* his feedback.

Not at all.

I can reply to anyone.

Nursie could disappear in the next millisecond and would not affect
me at all.

Heck your
fishing expeditions wouldn't be half as much fun without him here.

"Fishing expeditions?" I don't fish.

PCTA bait their hooks and offer me their lines. No problem at all
to reel them in. Easy thing.

The objections to Quitefine and Blackguard are their anonymity, not
their content. Okay. Your answer to all their questions is "you're
anonymous"

Tsk.

it a Task it, eh? 8^)

No, a "tsk," the odd human sound made by unbelievers when they
don't bother to make a verbal comment...or the sound made when
it's obvious (to everyone else) you didn't make any sense.

You are too young to have heard "Little Yellow Basket" when it was
popular. :-)

The anonymousies are NOT INVOLVED! No ID, nothing. [see the
commands uff das uber-oberst...]

So what. non-involvement isn't an issue with me. Note that I post to
you?

It is rather obvious you posted to me. You don't need to announce it.

Last time I checked, Dave didn't control me.

Dave doesn't control anybody...despite what he may think.

Dave isn't a radio regulator...despite kissing up to Mikey Powell like
a good Republican. :-)

yelling across the room Hey Dave, do you control what I post?

He can't hear you. Still has his head deep into the Orion manual,
trying to figure out the instructions.

You've not made any "answer" in your posting. Nothing at all.

Umm, it was his answer, and a comment by me.

You've still not said anything.

But you knew that, eh?

Yes...I'm just emphasizing it for the benefit of those slow readers who
have to run their fingers under words on the screen when reading. :-)

What you've demonstrated is just another item in the becoming-
clear PCTA extra Double Standard: Anyone attacking NCTAs
is "OK." Anyone against PCTA extras should be forbidden
everything. :-)

Who's attacking anyone? Paraaanoiia!

Nope. Rather obvious...unless one is a PCTA extra with the Double
Standard. They can ATTACK all they want. And do! :-)

Poor babies just can't take the return fire. Tsk. :-)

Anonymousies will creep in to "defend" their "honor" and to do more
"attacks" on NCTA. They will help your cheer. Or the uber-oberst or
the gunnery nursie will check in with their mirrors. No problem.

Now, did you have anything of substance to say or are you just killing
time on the computer when you could be playing with your radios?