Len Over 21 wrote:

In article , Mike Coslo
writes:


Len Over 21 wrote:


In article , Mike Coslo
writes:


Oh, and the anonymousies are anonymous because they can't
handle it under their own identity. Think of that. :-)

Dunno. I don't see anything either of them have posted that is
particularly "non-handlable".

Both are NOT INVOLVED!

No ID, nothing.

Follow der uber-oberst's commands given in here. He is PCTA extra.

Since when does "der uber-oberst's" commands affect me? Or you for that


matter?


All the PCTA extras in here stick together.

Like crazy glue. :-)


For an ostensibly smart fella, you fall into categorization pretty
easily.

"Ostensibly?" :-)

Yeah, like apparently, like to all outward appearances. It is a perfect fit.


Categorization is the name of the game with the PCTA extras here.

All those who aren't "ostensibly" as good as they are categorized
as "uninvolved" or something else horribly wrong. :-)

Noun sands! I'm a nickle extra, 5wpm and the new tests, I've only been a
ham for 5 years, and an Extra for a couple. Ostensibly, I would be one
of their targets PCTA or not.

I'll post what I want, and if you don't post because of some
"command" given by someone else here, you are the victim.

I am a "victim" now? Of what? :-)


But since you
do post whatever you want, it shows the fallacy of your statement, so
why do you keep posting that?


Tsk. I am NOT a PCTA extra.

I call 'em as I see 'em...and one cannot possibly miss seeing those
PCTA extra commands and epistles. :-)


Of course you know! ;^)


I know more than you care to admit. :-)

- mike KB3EIA -