In article , Mike Coslo writes:
William wrote:
(Quitefine) wrote in message
...
In article ,
(Blackguard) writes:
You worry overmuch about Quitefine's and Blackguard's identity!
We find it interesting
the anonymity of some
[such as 'Leo'] is respected,
while that of others is not.
Double standard?
No. I'm not the least bit worried about about your identity. Makes
no real difference. However, the reaction of the PCTA, specifically
Steve/K4YZ/K4CAP, to any anonymous post that disagrees with him is a
call to arms, and usually results in a "cowardly scum" accusation.
So WHAT, Brian? Steve is Pro code test, so you decide everyone who is
pro code test is like Steve?
BINGO!
Len does the same thing. All PCTA hams bear responsibility for what any PCTA
ham does. But that rule only applies to PCTA folks.
If Steve has a problem with anonymous posters, so what?
I'm certainly not going to condemn every anonymous poster no matter if
they disagree with me or not. I won't condemn Blackguard or Quitefine or
Leo or any of them.
It ain't my fight, and you'll not be able to make it my fight. I may
occasionally have something to say if one of them makes a particularly
offensive post, but none of them have.
Which is the most offensive thing of all....;-)
You are taking two different things here, notably the fact that some of
us don't condemn anonymous posters, and furthermore, we also don't
condemn anonymous posters that may agree with us, and expecting
something that just isn't human nature. Now when the anonymous poster
disagrees with us, its more likely that a person will say something
negative about the anonymous poster, but that doesn't mean we all have to.
All true but it makes no difference.
You can post as Billybeeper all day as far as I am concerned. Leo is
civil, and I have no problem with that.
Agreed!
73 de Jim, N2EY