Thread
:
Jim = Quitefine?
View Single Post
#
4
September 20th 04, 06:54 AM
Quitefine
Posts: n/a
In article ,
(Len Over 21) writes:
In article , Mike Coslo
writes:
Oh, and the anonymousies are anonymous because they can't
handle it under their own identity. Think of that. :-)
Dunno. I don't see anything either of them have posted that is
particularly "non-handlable".
Both are NOT INVOLVED!
We are involved, Len.
We are much more involved
than you are.
No ID, nothing.
Why is that a problem
for you?
Most of your postings
do not contain any 'ID'.
You have no problem
with the anonymous postings
of "Leo", nor the non-ID
postings of "billybeeper".
Why should we be treated
differently?
Follow der uber-oberst's commands given in here. He is PCTA extra.
You have difficulty referring
to people by their names.
Why?
:-)
Not funny.
Reply With Quote
