RadioBanter - View Single Post

October 11th 04, 01:27 PM

PAMNO (N2EY) wrote in message ...
In article , (Steve
Robeson K4CAP) writes:

Subject: US Licensing Restructuring ??? When ???
From: (N2EY)
Date: 10/8/2004 11:30 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message
...

I'm still waiting for Lennie to regale us with what RF devices our
lives
can't do without that he allegedly had a hand in creating.

Again, not the issue.

Sure it is, Jim!

No, it isn't.

Suppose some nonham "had a hand in creating" the cell phone, or the
802.11G modem, or the RF ID tag reader used on containers, trucks and
railcars, or a host of other things. Does that *technical* achievement
somehow make him/her the most qualified person to set the rules and
regs in *amateur* radio?

We're not talking about any other person, Jim.

Just one.

Why should different rules apply?

So there can be a double standard.

One that makes a point of being antagonistic and deceitful.

Look beyond that for a moment. Consider my question again:

Suppose some nonham "had a hand in creating" the cell phone, or the
802.11G modem, or the RF ID tag reader used on containers, trucks and
railcars, or a host of other things. Does that *technical* achievement
somehow make him/her the most qualified person to set the rules and
regs in *amateur* radio?

Yes or no or something else?

Jim, you will find that in real life, non-hams that may also be
non-technical are setting the rules for amateur radio.

Be that as it may, amateur radio is a public resource and the public,
no matter who they are, may comment on amateur radio.

Lennie has insisted that his "professional" career was far more productive
and useful than anything Amateurs do.

Where did he do that?

You're kidding, right? Which one of thousands of posts shall we refer
to...?!?!

Pick some...

73 de Jim, N2EY

Indeed. While you're searching the archives, pick out some homosexual
inuendo that Steve has made, but claims he hasn't.