Subject: Ya Screwed Up Again, Brain...
From: Mike Coslo
Date: 10/15/2004 2:59 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:
William wrote:
Now be a good little caped-boy and finish the list.
So it is okay to "threaten" another as long as they were "threatened"?
Quite frankly Brian. If anyone threatened me in here, legitimately and
identifiably, I would be to the proper authorities so quickly that the
person threatening me would know about it in a few minutes.
Otherwise why waste the time?
And that is Quitethetruth!
Of course no threat was made here, Mike.
I related the happenings of another situation wherein a person had been
harrassing an Internet group (not a USENET group, but similar...). The person,
much like Lennie, made it a point of trying to be the King Of The Hill, used
copious profanities, and just otherwise was a PITA.
The news story related the efforts of the participants to get this creep
off thier group, but even after he'd been booted from a couple different ISP's,
he'd show up through a remailer or other anonymous posting.
Unfortunately the participants took it upon themselves to strike back in
the manner that I related herein.
Of course Brainless and Sir Scummy said I was "threatening" them and
"terrorizing" thier spouses.
Brain will not be able to quote a post wherein I or any other person
threatened him, his family, Lennie or his family in any way shape or form
because it didn't happen.
Brain flatters himself that I or any other person who even remotely
disdains the idea of imprisonment would risk said imprisonment over him.
He truly is one egocentric creep.
73
Steve, K4YZ