RadioBanter - View Single Post

October 24th 04, 07:41 AM

(William) wrote in message . com...
(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ...

1. Still doesn't change the "message", whichg has nothing to do with YOUR
assertion that "numerous Extras" thumb their noses at lower class operators.
You still haven't provided a single valid quote.

See how you twist everything?

Nothing's "twisted", Brain, except your perceptions of reality.

There aren't even "numerous" hams on RRAP, so why would I say
"numerous???

Idiot.

Sure there are. Just the "regulars" alone are 12-15.

Don't agree? Check Webster's.

2. Yep.

3. Yep.

4. No, I'm not.

Yes, you do, and yes, you are.

5. It doesn't matter WHERE you post from...the FACT remains that your
post was several HOURS after the initial exchange occured. You had more than
adequate time to read the posts before trying to weasle your way into yet
another feeble rant.

Feeble apology.

It wasn't for you to say, Brain.

You lied. Yuo go caught. You won't apologize. Feeble.

6. "Sorrow or remorse"....No. Sincere apology for having got the
attribute on the article's true origin, yes.

Not -even- that. You merely apologised for getting the magazine
citation wrong.

Yep...Exactly right.

Your accusation of plagiarism stands.

And so far it appears I was wrong. We'll know in a day or two.

"Sorrow or remorse" is for the death of a relative or friend, or backing
over one of the kid's bikes.

And when it comes to "buying time", YOU are the master of that...We've
waited almost four years now for some proof of the validity of your alleged
Somalia operation, and it's been almost a year now since your silly "Unlicensed
devices" rants. If I take a week to get a response from ARRL to determine the
nature of the article that I recall, "SO WHAT...?!?!

So your accusation of plagiarism stands. You apologized for the wrong
thing, which is what makes your "sincere" apology completely
worthless.

I apologized for that which I know to be wrong.

And so far, your assertion of what is "worthless" or not sincere
still don't stand since the person they were offered to DID think they
were worthy and sincere since he accepted them.

I've already proven you wrong on your assertion that I allegedly never say
I am sorry or acknowledge an error. Done that in the last 24 hours. Still no
apology from YOU for it...Just some lame "you really didn't mean it" claim.

The accusation was one of plagiarism, not which magazine it was
published in. Your "sincere" apology over the incorrect citation is
completely meaningless.

Completely meaningless to YOU, however you were not the intended
recipient, ergo YOUR definition of what is meaningless or insincere is
itself worthless.

Seems it was good enough for Hans, the aggrieved one in this case, to
accept it.

He was in such shock that you actually apologized he almost missed
your insincerity. Then he said he was waiting for the rest of the
apology, (the part about plagiarism).

Oh...IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
SEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE...YOU are now reading and
interpreting Hans' mail for him!

I didn't realize that Hans was so physically or mentally incapable
of making his on assessments and he had you to depend on for making
those

It's just as well...If you HAD done it I'd be in ICU with a stroke at this
very moment!

Steve, K4YZ

If that's all it would take I'd lie and make an apology right now.
But you're the one lying, so your promise of a stroke will just have
to wait.

Well..you'e already half way there, Brain...You've already lied
today, some again in this post.

As for the stroke, I know you don't have the strength of
character to apologize even when the evidence is so overwhelmingly
against you...like the last 2 days, Brain.

Brian P. Burke is a documented liar without the strength of
character to admit an error or apologize for it.

Period.

Steve, K4YZ