"KØHB" wrote in message link.net...
"Brian Kelly" wrote


A big airliner is a big airliner, they all tote/toted tons of JP4/5
then and now, doesn't matter if it's being flown by an AAL 767 piloted
by a 15,000 hr. column jock or a hijacked 767 piloted by a sand roach.
They all burn equally well inside hi-rise buildings. If the building
comes down because it's core structure wasn't sufficiently
heat-resistant then in fairness who really did screw the moose?

"Over to you Hans".


You're right, Brian. It wasn't the fault of the religious freedom
fighters that the WTC towers are rubble. It's the fault of the
designers.

What the hell was I thinking!

Oh stop it Hans. The comments I made are completely apolitical and
involved only a small band of purely technical issues. Specifically
there appears to be a strong possibility that many lives might have
been saved if the designers of the towers hadn't failed to take into
account the damage burning A/C fuel would do to the survivability of
the towers. Has absolutely nothing to do with who flew what into the
towers for whatever reasons or reasons. It's about a design model of a
collison between a A/C and the towers and nothing more.

But then again this is, after all, RRAP.


73, de Hans, K0HB

w3rv