| 
				  
 
			
			In article , Mike Coslowrites:
 
 
 Then I advise that your seeing an opthalmologist for an
 eye examination is a good idea.  That way you could observe
 the several fracases that nursie starts with ANYONE who
 disagrees with him...besides Brian, try Hans and Dieter.
 
 Takes at least two people to make a fight.
 
 Not in computer-modem communications venues.  :-)
 
 Have to say I can't understand that one.
 
 Tsk.  After 20 years of computer-modem communications (on BBSs
 as well as the Internet), there are still individuals who jump on in
 with some ranting on someone or something, daring all to "challenge"
 them about that.  Funny as well as pathetic.
 
 
 
 Thank you Mike Tyson.  [excellent taste?  :-) ]
 
 Tyson foods?
 
 Tyson the ear-biter.  :-)
 
 
 Stop objecting to personal insults?  Stop objecting to insulting remarks
 about spouses?  Stop objecting to manufactured lies he makes about
 my past?
 
 Now your getting it!
 
 Ah, so score one for "rules" favoring the PCTA extras!
 
 They are allowed to DO anything, SAY anything...but no one else
 should be posting?
 
 Gosh, you sure know how to wall off the playing field only for your
 team...
 
 
 In general, the PCTA comments on retention of the code test are
 (and were long ago) repetitive, puerile, and invalid.  All any of them
 can do is resort to is pejorating any outspoken NCTA.
 
 Exactly as are the arguments against it. THere are no new arguments, no
 
 new material. It's so old.
 
 There's no reasoning with emotional belief systems...such as the
 PCTA's insistence that all who come after must jump through the
 same hoops they had to when younger.
 
 I agree it's "old."  Morse code was first used in 1844.  160 years ago.
 Quite OLD.  :-)
 
 
 We are all big boys now.  You can call them ****ing contests
 rather than use the cutesy euphemisms.
 
 Michael Powell's gonna get us! ;^)
 
 For what?  Failure to gratuitously use cutesy euphemisms?   :-)
 
 Mikey Powell is already getting in more hot water that he can't
 swim in very well.  Try reading the business section of your paper
 beyond the Howard Stern BS pieces.  FCC and Powell have been
 prominent in the bigger papers for other than broadcasting.
 
 
 ****ing contests with nursie are NOT any "battle of wits."  :-)
 
 Its the complaints and defenses I don't get.
 
 You aren't controversial enough, try too hard to work both sides of
 the aisle.  Align yourself with one or the other side and you will
 get MANY complaints!  :-)
 
 I've been called much worse than that. One fine fellow even threatened
 to kill me. Before I could do anything about it, he was arrested and
 jailed on some other charges, so an offhand threat - and a real one to
 boot - wasn't going to add a whole lot more time to his sentence.
 
 Tsk.  Offing him would have freed up some taxpayer monies, no?
 
 Do you LIKE that sort of thing?
 
 Life in the jungle, sir! 8^)
 
 No problem in here.  Bunch of snarling PCTA pussiecats.  :-)
 
 Bunch of wussies here compared to other newsgroups or the
 nonsense that went on in some of the BBSs before Internet.
 
 Just a habit of mine to not speak ill of the dead.
 
 Feel free to say nice things about Adolph Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Ted
 Bundy.  They are all dead.  :-)
 
 Okay, I'm still waiting for those "nice things" about that trio.
 
 Should I name some more?   :-)
 
 
 Tsk.  You mistake persistence for obsession.  :-)
 
 And many obsessed people just think they are persistent. Null.
 
 You got a null-null score...try a remedial class next summer.
 
 Let me know when there's a federal requirement to run for some
 political office in order to talk about political affairs, OK?
 
 Since when did the First Amendment get altered?  Every one who
 is a USA citizen has the Right to communicate with their
 government...about any existing laws and potential, pending laws.
 
 
 Morse code was a boon to landline communications two centuries
 back (in the 1800s), enabling the wired telegraphy service providers
 to give good service to all needing quick communications.
 
 When radio as a communications medium was demonstrated, morse
 code was used...not because it was unique, the best, or any other
 positive attribute.  On-off keying of early radio transmitters was the
 ONLY practical means to use technologically-primitive early radio
 apparatus for communications.
 
 For some radio amateurs in the United States, morse code skill is
 about the ONLY thing they have to show their "superiority" in a
 radio service that is still just a hobby.  Tsk.  Those amateurs are
 the ones seeing a mythical "sky is falling" scenario if the code test
 is ever eliminated.  Not my paranoia.  :-)
 
 I've been transmitting RF energy legally since 1953, over more
 parts of the EM spectrum than is allowed to radio amateurs.  Never
 had any requirement to demonstrate any morse code skill to anyone
 in order to transmit below 30 MHz...or above it.  Doesn't make any
 personal difference to me whether or not the code test stays or is
 tossed in the dumpster.  It's time the code test went to the landfill.
 It's long overdue.
 
 All those PCTA extras just hate the thought of removing the code
 test.  For so many of them it's all they've got to show their eliteness
 in a hobby.  shrug   Some of them get rather angry and want to
 "fight" about it, calling any persistent NCTA personal insults.
 
 Thanks for another story. I really do enjoy them (and I'm not being
 sarcastic.
 
 Tsk.  NOT a "story."  Documented fact.
 
 Your "Why" would indicate that you simply aren't interested in the ARS
 to the level that you would take the effort to get the license.
 
 Tsk.  I don't "owe" anyone a reason for my doing anything.  :-)
 
 Of course not. But I must admit that I find that a rather odd response
 to my statement.
 
 Tsk.  You are too into ham radio as a personal thing.  You must think
 that unlicensed folks (unlicensed in the amateur radio service, that is)
 don't know anything about radio?
 
 There are lots and lots of Parts to Title 47 C.F.R.  From time to time
 all of them MUST be corrected, revised, brought up to date.  "Radio"
 is still evolving, has existed only for 108 years.  It has grown much
 since its infancy, changed considerably.  No one Part of Title 47 can
 remain as-is forever, nor is amateur radio solely the provence of some
 olde-tyme hammes to use as their private playground.
 
 Do you "owe" someone anything for talking about politics?  Does one
 HAVE to be IN politics to talk about it?  :-)
 
 I'm not interested in joining any Archaic Radiotelegraphy Society.
 
 Right. Your why comes up that way. Just as I note above.
 
 Tsk.  I might, at some future date, get an amateur radio license.
 Or maybe not.  [one can't get too specific in this bunch of anal-
 retentive prissy literalists, they think everything one says is some
 kind of Religious Vow taken before God!]
 
 Why should I take the trouble to relearn morse code just for a
 chance to get a low-cost federal merit badge?  I don't need to
 prove myself in anything to anyone on any endeavor.
 
 You forget I HAVE a federal radio operator license and obtained it
 long ago.  :-)   Not a big deal.  Had to use it only two years after
 getting that in 1956.
 
 Tsk.  I was into HF radio communications without ANY sort of
 license requirement from 1953 to 1956.  Certainly not having any
 sort of requirement to learn or use morse code.  Not once did
 that come up for the next half century of radio transmitting.
 
 Hehe, I was just about in diapers then! 8^)
 
 Irrelevant.
 
 Why yes, I do! I have spent most of my career in computers, from the
 old IBM mainframes of the 70's to today's so called cutting edge PC's.
 Ended up making videos and doing photography in addition. So now I am
 interested in learning more about RF, yet don't want to go back to
 school. Here I is! Having a whale of a good time, learning all kinds of
 new stuff!
 
 You've only just begun to learn.
 
 Guaranteed you WON'T learn anything if you adopt a pose of being
 the Great (Amateur) Communicator because you are a code-tested
 extra in front of some long-time other-radio-service pros.  Listen and
 learn...there is much to be gained by taking advantage of their
 knowledge...but be careful on HOW you act.
 
 You have to realize that those older than you have ALREADY met
 up with the braggarts and the insolents in life as well as having
 gained an enormous amount of experience.  They will KNOW when
 you don't know something but are trying to pass yourself off as
 something you are not.  You get eaten alive in trying that.
 
 
 Had a friend in Junior High school. Short fellow, pretty funny guy. The
 guys in our group started calling him "Stub", referring to a particular
 body part. That irritated the heck out of him. He'd yell at them, tell
 'em to knock it off. This was getting pretty stressful for the guy. Once
 he even got into a fight with another kid over being called "Stub". As
 one of the few people in the group that didn't call him that, he often
 talked with me about how frustrated he was. I gave what advice I could,
 but he found it lacking. Finally one day a new kid shows up, and we're
 doing introductions. When I introduced him to the new guy in front of
 everyone by his proper name, (Tim) he just went up to the new guy, shook
 his hand, and said "Aww F**K it, just call me Stub!" Name went away
 immediately.
 
 Nice tale, but life doesn't work that way all the time.
 
 Those who do the name-calling don't get absolution from their sins
 therefore they usually continue.  They think they can "get away"
 with anything they do.
 
 The KKK is a good example of one group that not only liked to call
 others whatever they wanted but also killed those that objected
 to their actions too strongly.
 
 Anything
 
 
 
 |