Len Over 21 wrote:
In article , Mike Coslo writes:
Len Over 21 wrote:
In article , Mike Coslo
writes:
Len Over 21 wrote:
In article , Mike Coslo
writes:
N2EY wrote:
In article ,
(Len Over 21) writes:
In article , Robert Casey
writes:
For some radio amateurs in the United States, morse code skill is
about the ONLY thing they have to show their "superiority" in a
radio service that is still just a hobby. Tsk. Those amateurs are
the ones seeing a mythical "sky is falling" scenario if the code test
is ever eliminated. Not my paranoia. :-)
Some radio amateurs have told you that morse skill is the only
"superiority" they have in amateur radio? I don't believe you.
The hobby is one in which you are not a participant, code tested or
otherwise.
I've been transmitting RF energy legally since 1953, over more
parts of the EM spectrum than is allowed to radio amateurs.
That's wonderful for you, Leonard. If it provides you solace, go to
those parts of the spectrum permitted to you and operate. Live it up.
The hams I know are pretty much content to stay within their allocated
bands. I know of none expressing envy of those who may legally transmit
elsewhere.
It seems obvious that you have some envy of radio amateurs. Why else
would you haunt this newsgroup and appoint yourself advocate for
something or other?
Never
had any requirement to demonstrate any morse code skill to anyone
in order to transmit below 30 MHz...or above it.
That's fine. In amateur radio, you'll need to demonstrate a little
knowledge to the tune of 5 wpm to operate below 30 MHz. If those
frequencies above 30 megs are your cup of tea, you needn't learn morse
at all.
Doesn't make any
personal difference to me whether or not the code test stays or is
tossed in the dumpster. It's time the code test went to the landfill.
It's long overdue.
Many disagree with you. I'm one of 'em.
All those PCTA extras just hate the thought of removing the code
test. For so many of them it's all they've got to show their eliteness
in a hobby. shrug Some of them get rather angry and want to
"fight" about it, calling any persistent NCTA personal insults.
You, on the other hand, never get angry and never insult anyone with a
different point of view than your own. :-) :-)
I've operated in many radio services. Never once had to use any old
morse or be required to know it...even though I did "know it" once,
way back in time. Doesn't matter. I don't look on the code test as
some kind of my-personal sort of thing. The code test isn't necessary
for the FCC nor anyone else except all those Archaic Radiotelegraphy
Society "extras."
It isn't only Extra class licensees who support continued morse testing.
Where did you get the idea that it was so?
As to personal time spent "learning" something, I've spent many
more hours per day over many, many more months to complete
my formal schooling.
You probably spent those hours because you had requirements to fulfill
in order to complete school. Amateur radio isn't any different. There
are requirements to fulfill to qualify for the three license classes.
No exceptions are granted for "I don't want to".
Your "Why" would indicate that you simply aren't interested in the ARS
to the level that you would take the effort to get the license.
Tsk. I don't "owe" anyone a reason for my doing anything. :-)
Mike wasn't asking for your reason for doing anything; he was asking for
your reason for doing nothing. :-) :-)
I'm not interested in joining any Archaic Radiotelegraphy Society.
Has someone invited to join one?
You forget I HAVE a federal radio operator license and obtained it
long ago. :-)
Well, there you go then. Use that one.
Not a big deal. Had to use it only two years after
getting that in 1956. Such federal licenses make some folks think
they are real big shots (stretch that O vertically). Not me. Just a
piece of paper.
It must have some meaning to you. After all, you've brought it up time
and time again.
Dave K8MN
|