Len Over 21 wrote:
In article ,
(N2EY) writes:
(Len Over 21) wrote in message
...
In article ,
(William) writes:
(N2EY) wrote in message
...
In article ,
(Len Over 21) writes:
In article ,
PAMNO
(N2EY) writes:
Jimmie got as far as looking up Bear bombers in some book.
Naw, just the Internet. Found out they weren't a threat to Len when he
was in Japan.
Sunuvagun!
Tsk. You seem to be saying there were NO Soviet bombers in
range of Japan in the 1950s?
That's wrong (again), Leonard. He is saying that Soviet "Bear" bombers
could not have been a threat to you during your military service in
Japan, despite what you indicated here. As with your well known
"Sphincter Post", it leads some of us to question your character.
The bile on rrap comes from the three-way Steve/Len/Wiliam whizzing
contest. You all must get something from it, because you sure put a
lot of effort into it.
Tsk. Rev. Jim is readying another Sermon on the Antenna Mount?
Jim states a fact. Don't you have an acceptable response?
Rev. Jim "puts a lot of effort" into making SURE that all those
he thinks need "corrections" get those "corrections!" QED.
What has that to do with your whizzing contest?
btw, Len, a little googling turned up the fun fact that Steve began
calling you a putz back on August 6, 1999 - if not earlier. Of course
you had previously made a habit of calling him "nursie" and other
names, and referring to him by the wrong gender.
Tsk. You are still being Judge and Jury via Google, aintfcha?
:-)
Jim is? Not at all, Leonard. Your archived words and the dates on
which you posted them are archived. It is proof of your actions. In
this case, things didn't happen the way you claim they did.
When Rev. Jim runs out of arguments in the present, he MUST
resort to Googling to "prove" something.
....and it looks like the Google archives of newsgroup posts did just
that. The archive seems to prove that version of events is not correct.
Jimmie thinks he can "win" some past arguments by repeating and
rehashing OLD ones?
When you start the "Jimmie" stuff, it is obvious that he has zapped you
good. You made a recent statement and issued it as a factual account of
something which took place. The trouble is, the Google archives say
otherwise.
Of course...if for no other reason that Jimmie
Must Be Right in his own mind. Subject itself be damned, concentrate
on defaming the opponent in order to "win." Tsk.
Diversion on your part. If you didn't want to be batted around on this
issue, you could have refrained from, "Well, HE started it".
Perhaps you need to try some new techniques if you want him to stop.
Ah...you must have run out of damp hankies to slap folk on the
wrist as self-styled moderator! :-)
When did it become Jim's job to regulate Steve?
But I don't think you want him to stop.
Doesn't really matter to me. There will ALWAYS be some yo-yo
out there who can't argue a subject for squat and does the personal
insult thing in order to "win an argument." :-) Those are alleasy
marks. Plenty of them. :-)
If anyone would know, you'd know.
You don't want anyone else doing what you do.
Dave K8MN