Dave Heil wrote in message ...
Len Over 21 wrote:
In article , Dave Heil
writes:
Len Over 21 wrote:
In article , Dave Heil
writes:
Len Over 21 wrote:
In article , Dave Heil
writes:
Len Over 21 wrote:
In article ,
PAMNO
(N2EY) writes:
Mr. Kerry and I have something in common: Neither of us are President
of the United States.
Neither is Dubya. :-)
Yes, he is. No hanging chad; no 500 Florida votes; no Supreme Court; no
doubt of the popular vote; no problem with the electoral vote. End of
story. You have four years to develop more believable conspiracy
theories.
The Supremes declared Mr. Bush to be the winner of the 2000 election,
in accordance with the Constitution. The undisputed results of the
2004 election reelected him for another 4 years.
Your prussian schoolmaster tone is very tiring.
My "tone"? Can you actually hear me?
Ah, but you TAP DANCED AWAY FROM ANSWERING! :-)
I gave you an answer: "(no, I never mentioned that in detail. enjoy
the suspense.)" I can give you an answer though I'm not forced to do
so. I don't guaranty that you'll like the answer.
You did NOT say in any detail WHAT you did. Tsk.
No, I don't believe I did. Task.
Tell us, might warrior of in-country action, describe your herosim
"herosim"?
under fire, how you closed with and destroyed the enemy with
your magnificant morsemanship.
I don't believe I will, Leonard.
You made insulting remarks about it.
I ran out of medals and pretty certificates (suitable for framing).
You no more issue medals and certificates for Viet Nam service than you
participate in amateur radio.
I wasn't claiming to "issue medals and certificates for Viet Nam
service (or Vietnam service)." Tsk. You are connecting unrelated
sentences. :-)
One of those sentences was directly under the other. You wrote both of
them. If they aren't connected, what can the second one mean? :-) :-)
Are you now teaching English?
I will if you like. Would you like to sign up for a remedial course?
Are you going to "dismiss" some from your "class" if strict, absolute
formalism isn't obeyed? Seig Heil!
If you mean the absolute formalism of placing sentence which you claim
are not related to other sentences immediately below them, yes you are
dismissed. Give my regards to Godwin.
I think you just missed something important, Dave.
From his long experience in computer-modem communications, Len is
clearly aware of Godwin's Law. In fact he will now probably regale us
with a long boring lecture on Mr. Godwin and the origin of his famous
Law, trying to divert and use up bandwidth.
In any event, his above violation ("Seig Heil!") can hardly be
accidental or involuntary.
Of course Godwin's Law states that the first person in a discussion to
revert to Hitler/Nazi references towards his opponent summarily
forfeits. IOW, loses the whole thing.
It is therefore clearly obvious that Len has lost this discussion, and
that his Godwin violation is his indirect way of admitting defeat,
since he can't or won't simply say so out in the open.
Think of how many other times Len has done the same thing...
73 de Jim, N2EY