Steve Robeson K4YZ wrote:
Subject: Designed And Built By PROFESSIONALS....
From: (N2EY)
Date: 11/12/2004 4:04 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:
(Steve Robeson K4YZ) wrote in message
...
He walks over you like an old oriental rug.
How?
How...?!?!
Yes, how?
Has Len been able to force me to do anything? To do better than me in
*any* amateur-radio-related activity? To convincingly show that *any*
of my arguments here are flat-out wrong?
He keeps you coming back when you keep telling everyone else to "stop
responding to him".
=0
I know a good opthamologist, Jim!
Look again. Between Len and me - who is in control, who acts mature,
and who is acting out and being immature?
That's not the point, Jim.
The point is suggesting one course of actions to everyone else, yet
continuing the same course of action yourself. It doesn't look right.
Len calls me name, posts things that aren't true and attempts to insult
me.
In general he behaves like an out-of-control child here. Does that mean I
should do the same?
Hmmm?
"Hmmm?" indeed, Jim.
You do keep coming back. It does keep giving him a "raison de guerre"
You have children, Steve. If one of them acts like a child, do *you*
do the same? I doubt it very much.
Thankfully when she gets out of sorts, I can redirect her and she acts
accordingly. There ae consequences for acting foolish, and she rarely
transgresses.
He's a scumbag bully.
Well, that's a matter of opinion.
It's a matter of fact.
A "bully" is someone who gets others to do his/her bidding by force or
intimidation. When has Len been able to do that to me?
Everytime you respond to him, Jim...EVERY time.
At best, Len is a bully-wannabe.
Everytime you respond to him, he wins.
Someone in this NG taught me that...Now WHO could it be...?!?!
Can you cite a single project or program that incorporates a SINGLE
reference to any of Lennie's "Ham Radio" writings?
Nope. But then again, I haven't read every issue of "ham radio", "CQ"
or "73". Nor have I visited every amateur radio website in existence.
There may exist, somewhere out there, a reference to Len's articles in
"ham radio" magazine.
Besides, what does it matter? Len's most recent article in "ham radio"
was published over 22 years ago IIRC.
And you can bet your bottom dollar if Sir Scumbag had even ONE citeable
use of ANY of his work in Amateur Radio, he'd have rubbed our noses in it by
now.
You've told me to set the example, Jim. I only comment on a LennieRant
on
rare occassion now, and usually only when commenting second hand because
someone else quoted him, usually either you or Dave.
But you're still calling names, etc.
Because he's still a putz.
That's a matter of opinion.
It's a matter of fact.
A bit of your own medicine, Kind Sir! Stop responding to him!
No comment?
Judge by my actions.
I'll judge by your next response to one of Lennie's posts.
Steve, I have to agree with you here. While we all at times reply to
Len, there isn't any point in telling each other not to. Jim, it
probably isn't all that consistent of an approach to kvetch about
Steve's postings to him. Granted you two have different approaches, but
that isn't the point here.
Its a newsgroup. There are sometimes nasty disagreeable people here. We
reply to them because there is something in it for us. Sometimes its
just plain fun! The guy on the other end is having fun too. So be it.
- Mike KB3EIA -