Thread
:
Get your Trophy US Extra Callsign (A KH0x call would be nice!)
View Single Post
#
10
November 23rd 04, 01:07 PM
Alun
Posts: n/a
(William) wrote in
m:
(Steve Robeson K4YZ) wrote in message
...
Subject: Get your Trophy US Extra Callsign (A KH0x call would be
nice!) From: Robert Casey
Date: 11/23/2004 12:13 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id: .net
At least the FCC did do something about club calls. They took 42 of
them away from a JA few years back :-) But for some strange reason,
they let him keep his primary station license, a W9 extra class
U.S. call.
73, Jim KH2D
Maybe they should get calls like WJ#XXX, or KJ#XXX...
If the FCC decides that it's proper for foriegners to get American
ham licenses.....
Perhaps you'd consider a Constitutional Amendment that restricts
US rights
and privileges to US citizens or persons legally landed here.
The FCC has already decided that it's proper for foreign
nationals to have
US license if they complete the prerequisites for that license and
exercise it within the parameters of Part 97.
Citizenship is not one of them.
Specific callsigns would be discriminatory under present US
interpretations of the Constitution.
73
Steve, K4YZ
Inneresting. Steve has pushed Phil Kane aside as our resident
communications attorney.
"You miss the point, Steve. The purpose of r.r.a.p. is no longer
discussion of policy, or learning something, or study of
communications
theory.
The purpose is to FIGHT and to denegrate the dignity of all who do not
agree with you! Any other post is off topic and is not welcome here.
Get with the program. No one is "mistaken" or "partially correct" on
r.r.a.p. They either 100% totally agree with you, or they are "a
lying,
scum sucking, bottom feeding no-code beeper." There is no in between,
and there must be at least one of each in every conversation here.
Anything which resembles a rational exchange of ideas and useful
information will either be ignored, or some enterprising induhvidual
will hijack the thread and turn it into an argument about Morse. No
other "Policy" conversation is allowed to survive unmolested.
72, de Hans, K0HB"
Steve is right, though.
Discrimination against resident aliens has been prohibited since Yick Wo v
Hopkins, which relied on the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment.
The facts of the case related to legislation against laundries being
constructed from wood in downtown San Fancisco. This law was overturned as
it was held that it was written only to discriminate against laundries
owned and operated by Chinese citizens.
Arguably, the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment only applies to
the states, but there are cases invoking the due process clause of the 5th
amendment, which is applicable to the federal government.
I beleive there was a Puerto Rican case in federal district court that
relied on either the 5th or the 14th in the alternative, allowing aliens to
become registered as professional engineers. I don't have the citation for
that one.
This is a little way off Phil Kane's speciality of communications law,
although no doubt the FCC can't discriminate against aliens. Maybe Phil
knows of some case law regarding aliens and the FCC?
I am not a lawyer, just an alien.
73 de Alun, N3KIP, G8VUK
Reply With Quote