View Single Post
  #7   Report Post  
Old December 16th 04, 05:37 PM
Steve Robeson K4YZ
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Subject: K0HB Supports Terrorist Use Of GPS Net Against America
From: PAMNO (N2EY)
Date: 12/16/2004 4:26 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

In article . com, "K4YZ"
writes:

"The Shrub"...?!?!


Yes.


Hardly. This nation has bandied-about it's "Don't Tread On Me" attitude
for since the fifties yet has gotten into the practice of tucking tail and
running when it get's slapped around a little bit.

We finally have a President who slapped back. Now everyone is upset that
he actaully DID what he said he would do.

If it's OK to call President Clinton "Slick Willy", then it's also OK to call
President Bush "the shrub".

"April Fool's Joke"...?!?!

Hans, you're an idiot or an Al-Queda supporter.


I don't think he's either.


I do.

His gross disrespect for a sitting President and obvious disdain for a
policy that is intended to deny potential adversaries the opportunity to use
our own systems against us speaks for itself.

Hans is an idiot and an Al-Queda supporter. His allegedly well-educated
mind could have more effectively expressed an opposing view of the government's
policies without being disrespectful or insulting. He didn't. He went right
to the deminutives. Funny how he accuses me of that...............

How do I know this?

Because ONLY an idiot or an Al-Queda supporter could suggest that
making it difficult for terrorists to use our own systems against us is
an "April Fool's Joke".


Why are we so dependent on such systems in the first place?


For the same reason we are so "dependent" on TV, radio, electric lights
and penicillin.

It makes our lives easier. Of course in the mean time we LOSE basic
skills that, in the absence of those assets, will be necessary.

BTW...I correct my earlier statement about Slick Willy making the
GPS net available in "93 or 94"...that was when he initially suggested
it. It became effective in 2000. It was discussed in Flying magazine
as early and the late 80's.

None-the-less, the idea of being able to inhibit or completely
disable the system is STILL not new, and I for one hope they DO keep
the reigns on it! It was an error to let it loose in the first place.


You mean "reins"?


Did you understand what I wrote, Jim?

Are you now going to follow in Brain's and Lennie's footsteps with
whittling a post down to spelling?

IIRC, the inhibition was turned off before Gulf War 1 and simply left turned
off.


Perhaps. Still does not negate the fact that it was a mistake to do so.

73

Steve, K4YZ