Thread: 97.21 (b)
View Single Post
  #18   Report Post  
Old January 11th 05, 01:25 AM
Mike Coslo
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Leo wrote:
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 15:24:07 -0500, Mike Coslo
wrote:


Leo wrote:


On 09 Jan 2005 04:51:35 GMT, (Lenof21) wrote:



In article , Leo
writes:



On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 15:36:59 -0800 (PST), "Phil Kane"
wrote:



On 08 Jan 2005 21:31:53 GMT, N2EY wrote:



Lenof21 wrote:


snip



Some even enter a batch of posts on a variety of subjects, apparently
hoping to get sonething on the hook.......what's the word for that
again...?


To imagine anyone on Usenet would do that. 8^)



.....found it - "Trolling" - that's the word I was looking for!



Here is a bit of a question. I had started a number of these threads
recently in order to get some newsgroup related activities going,
because in December the group simply was losing ground to the wild and
whacky adventures of some West Virginia hams, and some others of
indeterminate origin, but of the sort to turn us into a clone of
r.r.a.misc. So far, It has had its intended effect, to get some
discussion going.

So was that a troll?


snip



Note: All those wonderful braggarts are PCTA extra. They can say
anything, write anything, do anything in here and are absolved from ANY
criticism. Should they be taken to task, the task-taker is soundly
objected to with endearing personal perjoratives having little to do with
the subject.


Ipso facto, with a few exceptions - there are several OMs here who are
quite civil, knowledgeable and conversational, and do not possess the
NetNanny gene.....



It's a plain simple fact that all NCTA in here are always wrong, no matter
what they write on anything. No one who is of the NCTA persuasion
should bother debating the subject in here. The matter is closed and all
NCTA are forever wrong, incorrect, and probably have underarm odor.


.....and skinned knuckles!


Here's a challenge, Leo, if you're up to it.

Name the PCTA's in here (active) that have called NCTA's by such names.
I'll give you a start:

Steve is pretty famous for name calling.



Great idea! - that would certainly get a nice warm flamefest going,
wouldn't it?

Request respectfully declined.





And since this subthread turned into a Mike and Jim "tag-team" thing,
where do our names show up in that list? When have I called anyone a
nasty name? I don't think Jim ever has either.

note: I will admit the one time I called Len "Lennie". No insult was
intended, but he didn't like it, so I stopped.



Hmmm - maybe you're one of the exceptions?

Your pal was doing just fine too, until he decided to start using
profanities in his posts. To claim that another is speaking
"bull$#!+" is to directly infer that they are a "bull$#!+ter".


I admit, that was a bit odd. I'm known to drop the very occasional off
colored word, but only for effect.


Acgeed that this example does not meet your specification of "PCTA vs
NCTA", but as I said earlier it's more about personalities than it is
about affiliation.

And character.


Well sure.

- Mike KB3EIA -