On Sun, 27 Jul 2003, JJ wrote: 
 D. Stussy wrote: 
  On Sun, 27 Jul 2003, JJ wrote: 
  
 Alun Palmer wrote: 
  
 JJ  wrote in : 
  
 Dickhead Craniumless blubbered again and said: 
  
  
 What are you babbling about, JJ? He made it quite clear (except for 
 morons): 1. The FCC Rules & Regs make reference to the code 
 requirement as spelled out by the WRC. 
 2. The WRC no longer requires any code. 
 3. Ergo, the FCC Rules & Regs no longer require code. 
  
 What's so difficult to understand? (Other than English, that is.) 
  
 What are you babbling about dickieboy? Maybe his misconceptions are 
 clear to idiots like you (why does that suprised anyone?), but the fact 
 remains, until the FCC goes through the procedures necessary to 
 eliminate the code requirement for the amateur radio service, it is 
 still required and everything is just as it has been. Just because the 
 WAC no longer requires the code, does not automatically drop it from the 
 FCC requirements. Try reading more carefully and you might learn 
 something, like how to find the 10 meter band. 
 Lets see a newbie go for the General license and see if he can get one 
 without taking a code test. You are as dense as this keith bird. You 
 both must be really good on cb. 
  
  
 You display a complete lack of understanding. Try actually reading 
 97.301(e) and then you might understand the discussion. 
  
 And you understand just about as much as dickboy does. Until the FCC 
 changes it, nothing has changed, code is still required. 
  
  
  That requirement, by itself, is NOT enough. 
  
  See other replies, and the sub-thread titled "Alternate interpretation." 
 
 Alternate interpret all you want, until the FCC changes the rules, 
 nothing has changed. The FCC makes the final interpretation and they 
 have NOT changed the rules regarding a code test. 
 
The FCC, as a government agency, is bound by international treaty and law, and 
here, the international law HAS CHANGED, so any regulation that refers to it 
CAN (and in this case, HAS) been affected. 
 
It's not "element 1 credit" by itself that determines a Technician class 
licensee's operating privilege on HF.  If it were, then I would agree that 
nothing has changed - but that's simply not the situation here. 
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 |