RadioBanter - View Single Post

September 4th 03, 10:22 PM

From: (Frank=A0Gilliland)
In ,
(Twistedhed) wrote:
snip
Yep. Post it.

Sure,,,,,here we have N3CVJ not only intentionally, wanton, willful,
breaking of federal communication law as set forth and defined by the
FCC (shouldn't a hammie of his status know better?) but committing
behavior that is construed by many LEOs to be of pedophilia-like nature,
of which ALL experts believe there is NO cure, only a time span until
they approach another child.
I mean, Frankie,,you just claimed in another thread that there is NO
excuse for breaking the law pertaining to the airwaves....according to
Hall himself, you condone this type behavior he commits...hmmmm,,,but
you hae a problem with DX and freebanding.LOL....your priorities are
whacked, Frankie, and I am certain beyond any doubt whatsoever, not one
person in this group would want either of you near any children.

From: Dave Hall
Subject: WhAt FrEqUeNcEy DoEs A mObLiE pHoNe OpPeRaTe On? Date:
1999/12/16
Message-ID: #1/1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References:

Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=3Dus-ascii
X-Trace: tw12.nn.bcandid.com 945352043 207.224.84.38 (Thu, 16 Dec 1999
06:47:23 MST) Organization: Spew Radio Inc. MIME-Version: 1.0
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 06:47:23 MST Newsgroups:
rec.radio.cb
Who needs "Melrose Place" when you have a scanner? My neighborhood phone
traffic was no less juicy at times. Teenaged girls talking about their
first time with sex

Hmmm.... seems that there is more to that

post than what you quoted... let's put

it in context by adding the rest of his post,

shall we?

Certainly. editing it for brevity doesn't alter his beahvior one bit,
nor his violation of the law.

......, wife talking to newly found lover while

hubby watched Monday Night Football in the

next room, guys making drug buys, and even

caught one neighbor bitching about ME and all
my "radio stuff" to another.

It's fun to try to figure out who all those voices

belong to. Sometimes more entertaining than

TV, becasue it's REAL......
=A0
Dave

"Sandbagger"

When not taken out of context,

Out of context? LOL...his statement admitting breaking federal
communication law stands alone.

it doesn't sound like pedophilia to me

No surprise there. You two are quite alike.

or to any other reasonable person, which is

clearly why you have pulled it out of context

and interpreted it as such.

Feel free to ask anyone at all that you cite, or feel is "reasonable" if
they feel listening to minor children talk of their sexual liasons is
"juicy" let alone healthy, conducive behavior of one that continually
spoouts off about other folk's morals,,go on now, do as your told.

While there is no doubt that eavesdropping on
private conversations is illegal (and if you

have ever read my website

LOL...there it is again,,,,that ego,,,,I'm not interested in anything a
confirmed and self-admitted liar sets forth.

you would know that I'm not a big fan of

cordless or cell phones for just that reason), it

doesn't interfere with the conversation or

cause any harm or inconvenience.

Nevertheless,,,you're intentionally glossing over Davie-son's wanton,
illegal behavior. He has called several others here a criminal for no
less than freebanding. By your own words, he is "selecting what rules to
disregard" and, man, have you posted a ton of ignorance concerning how
you feel about such behavior. Not only is Hall's behavior hypocritical,
but your selective whining about WHO breaks laws is laughable in the
face of your ire.

Unless someone is listening for purposes

other than a morbid curiousity, I really don't

have a problem with scanners. I do -not-

condone eavesdropping on private

conversations. But the fact is that it does

happen,

HAhhahah..so does freebanding.

and I -do- warn people about using

cordless phones.

Not here you haven't. But go ahead and do it now and use N3CVJ as an
example.

Despite all that,

Despite your hypocrisy? No, Frankie,,,IN ADDITION, to your hypocrisy,,,,

the FCC has recognized the issue of

eavesdropping on cordless phones and has

taken steps in order to impede the efforts of

those that would listen to private

conversations for personal gain or the

commission of a crime.

Umm,,hey Frankie,,,intentionally monitoring private telephone calls IS a
crime, just as you hold freebanding is.

As the older, unsecure phones find their way

to the trash heaps, the issue is gradually

becoming moot.

Not moot at all. I merely use you and Hall's oft-repeated mantra that
it's the "BEHAVIOR" that makes such criminal acts so bad,,,,the blatant
disregarding of federal rules for personal satisfaction...try not to
lose site of what you selectively hold others to, Frankie.

_
Oh, wait a second, youre still tripping over your hairlipped lie looking
for that post you claimed I said the same thing about you in,,,,,,still
waiting, Frankie,,,you mean you lied? Again? Gee...
"I have admitted to lying in this ng and on
more than
one occasion." Frank
Gilliland )
BTW,,,what happened to that Vancouver
feed?

Never had one.

LOL...hokay!
Your Time Warner (TWTelecom) is in Vancouver, Frankie.

My ISP is in Spokane, Twisty.

Your Time Warner (TWTelecom) is in Vancouver, Frankie, the "feed" you
just lied and denied.

_
"I have admitted to lying in this ng, and on

more than one occasion"

Ah never mind,,,,one thing
at a time,,,,,now, about those RF pirates that you claimed affected your
daily work...

Do you want to know the names of the most

obnoxious offenders in this area?

Not at all. I'm not interested in anything about you. I am being polite,
to you, that is all. Your ego misinterprets such simple acts as much
more than they are. (sigh) Direct a post to myself, I shall respond,
When one makes a post on usenet, they are asking the one they directed
the post toward for attention in the form of a reply. That you can not
grasp the simple fashion in which usenet works, is testament to that
mounting communication deficit that ails you. Such behavior is your
forte and inherent to the unstable.

-----=3D Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored