In ,
(Twistedhed) wrote:

From: (Frank*Gilliland)
In ,
(Twistedhed) wrote:
snip
Your inability to address the topic is but one

manifestation of -your- communication deficit,

Twist.



I'm not the topic, Frankie,,I'm *your* topic.

And your communication deficit is manifesting itself again -- you already
responded to that part, which was three posts ago. Didn't you read the part
about the little arrows?

_
There goes the ego again, misinterpreting things and reading into things
that do not exist.
I can discuss any topic that you like,

Great. Then just to clarify your previous post,

were you saying that you think freebanding is

an "essential liberty"?


Practice the Golden Rule Frankie,,answer the question posed to your
first, then you may have some ground in which to cry and stomp your foot
and hold your breath and demand one answers the question you placed
subsequently.

You mean like your constant begging for the past year and a half on how
freebanders affect my work? No, I don't play by -your- golden rule, Twisty.

,but *refusal* to hold to the
_
golden rule is something you are blaming me for,

And for good reasons.


Your inability to converse and your deficit in communications are not
good reasons, Frankie.

I'm sure you will ask me to repeat those

reasons for the umpteenth time... I will, but

another day.


(chuckle)

LOL,,I't's always
another's fault for your misery, eh Frankie?

What misery, Twist? You are projecting again.

And just who is convinced of that, Frankie, besides your pedophile
friend and the other lid Kc8LDO? I'm not the one insisitng on making a
chatter/pposter the topic of my world.You go on and lay down, now, OM.

Now you are making mountains out of mole-hills.

_
To wit: Questions need
answered in the order they are received. You have yet to answer
questions to your claims,

Wrong. I have answered every question you

have asked. You may not have liked the

answer, but I did answer them.


Yea/ Cite it then..oh ,,,that's right,,you become constipated when asked
to provide for your claims...LOL.

List any question you have asked and I'll cite where I have already answered it.

Now -you-, on the other hand, have MANY

outstanding questions pending.



My questions to you are radio related. Yours are obsessive in nature and
all off topic. Your deficit in communication prevents you from telling
the diffference.

You bring up the topics yourself, Twist, don't blame me for your misery.

At least I don't

drag the discussion into a different topic every

other post.


Nope,,,,,,because you have not much room in your brain for multi-topics,
I am about all you can manage at once. It's like walking and chewing
gum,,some can't do it,,such as yourself.

Only because I am already wasting too much time on the computer. But it's not so
bad to spend a little more time indoors lately because the air here is loaded
with smoke from local forest fires, and kinda makes the eyes burn if I stay out
too long.

Back to the topic of the thread,

do you think Ben Franklin would agree that

freebanding is an "essential liberty"?



(snip) No.

Omigod, a straight answer!!! WONDERFUL!!! Now, did you deliberately misinterpret
Franklin's statement by substituting "essential liberty" for "a bit of freedom"?
Or did you honestly believe that "a bit of freedom" is what he meant?

Back to the order of the questions, as Franklin wasn't the
topic, but an incidental mention in whcih you are attempting to drag the
topic.

Actually, Franklin wasn't the topic because you allowed your communication
deficit to [mis]quote him under the name of Jefferson.

_
**which nullifies and cancels any right or point you may think you
raised by shouting that I refuse to answer any latter inquiry brought by
yourself.

If that had any validity at all, I wouldn't answer

ANY of your questions until you answer the

very first question that you ignored (and

continue to ignore): A long time ago you

accused me of a lot of things, things that you

could never back up with facts, and yet you

had the balls to say that I lied. Well, where

was that lie, Twist? Do you need to see the

post again?



Depends what I accused you of. What you claimed I accused you of, you
have failed to produce.

Holy ****. Twistedhed pleads ignorance once again. Try this on for size:

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=+%...num=6&filter=0
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=+%...num=5&filter=0
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=+%...num=1&filter=0

Do you need any more? So where was the lie, Twisty?

I posted that question no less than two dozen

times, and you have yet to answer it. Which

post would you like to see again?


The one where you claimed I accused you of something. Of course I
accused you of being a hammie,,you are.

Wrong, as you have been all along, and I have offered to prove to you all along.

Of course I accused you of being
on the opposite side of the state than which you claim,,,you are.

Again, wrong. And again, I have offered you proof. Each time you have refused.
It's obvious that you don't want the truth, probably because it would prove that
-you- are the liar. You probably don't even realize that there are now several
people in the newsgroup who know that I'm not N7VCF, or any other ham for that
matter, and consequently know that you are an idiot -- not for your persistence
in your lies and delusions, but for not taking the opportunity to learn the
truth (abandoning your "friend", as it were). Well, the offer still stands for
the time being.

All of them?



Just the one that pains you the most.

I cited three above. Do you need more?

Back to the topic: So who were those

presidents I quoted? This should be easy

even for you, Twist -- you only have to pick

two out of four. You should be able to use a

search engine and come up with the answers

real quick.
**






Let's take it one step at a time so Frankie can follow, shall we? Answer
the questions put to you first, and you will be entitled to ask one of
me. Golden rule, Frankie,,,

Like I said, I have answered it before. And like I said, you might not have
liked the answer:

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...40news.cet.com

Do you still need a picture? All you need to do is connect the dots. Dot #1: I'm
a BE at a local radio station. Dot #2: I own and run my own electronics/radio
shop. Dot #3: In the course of both jobs I work with licensees in your beloved
"freeband". Dot #4: Some of my clients are also CBers, and frequently bring in
what were once very good radios, but have been trashed by golden screwdriver
techs because some idiot wanted to get on your beloved "freeband". Dot #5: In
both jobs I also work with high-gain, high-quality audio equipment, which, when
not shielded during servicing, has a certain sensitivity to kilowatt charlie
rolling up the highway screaming "AUDIO-O-O-O" into an overdriven power mic
hooked up through a roger-squawk box to a radio optimized for overmodulation and
"swang". Dot #6: Sometimes you can hear kilowatt charlie jacking-off on the
radio even when the equipment IS shielded, which tends to **** off clients who
do their thing by playing their -own- music at the local night-club.

Are you getting the picture, or do you need more dots? And why was it so hard
for you to connect the dots yourself?

I don't behave according to -your- Golden rule,
Twist -- "Do unto others

-before- they do unto you".




That's why you are so angry and demanding.

Because I don't troll the newsgroups with a 'flame-before-flamed' attitude?
That's just plain stupid.

Now as for those two presidents, would it help

if I said that neither one of them is George?

,,,communication deficit does not alow you to comprehend such simple,
human, civilized behavior. You would rather focus on
MEMEMEMEMEMMMEM,,,LOL!
_
"I have lied several times in this ng, and on more than one occasion"
Frank Gilliland,
_
Once a liar, always a liar.

It takes integrity to admit one's mistakes.

Liars have no integrity, Frankie,

You should know better than anyone here.
*
I do.

I know you do. There is nobody that lies more and has less integrity than
yourself

I illustrate yours, Davies, and Nad's on a regular basis and will
continue to do so.

All you are demonstrating is that your obsession with us is so overpowering that
you will stack lie upon lie just to save face. Well, here's a newsflash, Twist:
You lost face about two years ago.

_
*A lie is so far removed from a mistake, that only a liar can attempt
to make a lie appear benign as a mistake.

Are you saying



Once again, Frankie, I said waht I said. Your pathetic need for
analogies to lessen the effect of your communication deficit is not
needed by anyone else..

Ok, I'll word it a little differently so as not to bruise your ego. IS IT
IMPOSSIBLE for a person to recognize, after the fact, that a decision
to tell a lie might have been a mistake?

So who do you think I am -this- week, Twist?
You have issues, Frankie,

Blah, blah, blah. Stay on topic.


I'm not the topic, Frankie, I'm *your* topic. Franklin wasn't the topic,
Frankie, it was an incidental you made *your* topic. Get a grip on
reality, OM.

Who were those two presidents? Here's another hint: One of them had a nickname,
all you need to do is fill in the blank: "Honest ___". Can you handle THAT?






-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----