Frank Gilliland wrote in message ...
In , "Brainbuster"
wrote:

No it is not. A defence lawyer stands up for people accused of crimes...
even child abusers. Are they "anti-legal?

Depends on their motivation. Why are -you- defending Twisty, Brain?


Hi Frank.

Once again... where am I "defending" him.
I am being accused of things, so I am defending myself.



Aren't you supporting him by defending him in his absence?


Where am I defending him?
If you look, you will see that someone said that there would be no trouble
if there was no "Twisty".
I am pointing out that they lied, the crap is continuing... they have just
chosen different targets.
In fact, they are even posting messages in an attempt to get "Twisty" to
reply, just in case he is ignoring them.


Not one straight answer to any of the requests for proof of your claims.
You cannot back up one word of your false allegations and suggestions.
You are the weakest link... Goodbye.

And you watch too much TV.


Actually, I watch very little. That is a very famous phrase, but I never
get to see the program.
I watch the soccer with my Son (I would not be bothered with it
otherwise), but I don't have much time for TV.
I'll admit to listening to the radio most of the time... you can work and
listen, but TV demands your attention.


So, why are you wading in, and helping Mr Dopers? I get the feeling that
there is something that you are hiding. I don't see a reason for us to
argue over the false claims that someone else has made... unless you care to
let us know why you need to get involved.


Brainbuster.