View Single Post
  #22   Report Post  
Old October 16th 03, 06:01 PM
Citizens For A Keyclown-Free Newsgroup
 
Posts: n/a
Default

(Cranus The Anus) wrote:
(Repeaterjammers For A Keyclown-Free

Newsgroup) wrote
in message . com...
(Cranus The Anus) wrote:
(Repeaterjammers For A Keyclown-Free

Newsgroup)
spewed more garbage in message
.com...
(Richard Cranium) wrote in message . com...
(Pederasts For A Keyclown-Free

Newsgroup)
wrote
in message . com...
"Brainbuster" wrote in message

...
DouGayz A Doper wrote in message
. ..
wrote:
(DouGayz A Doper) wrote:
really? is dave hall a legit user? how about jerry

oxendine?
or
alan?

Simple: Are they CBers? If so they are legit users of this

newsgroup.
If they are not CBers, then they are not legit users of any CB
newsgroup.

Whos defines CB? You? CB as defined by the FCC is 40 channels 4w

AM
12
pep, no mods, type accepted equip only so that means all

keyclownz
and
freeloaders are not legit users according to you. Hardee har har

your
foot is in your gangrenous mouth now, pekkersukker.

Where did I ask for the FCC's definition of CB? Please point that

out
for us.


You didn't, jizzbag. You said,,,,


Thank you. Could you try to stay on topic?

If they are not CBers, then they are not legit users of any CB
newsgroup.


Which is true. Don't you understand the logic of the statement?

If you are a keyclown your not a CBer. Your a
FEDERAL CRIMINAL. And by
your logic you are not a legit user of any CB newsgroup.


I think I understand: Licensed amateurs never violate a Rule? I
don't believe that for a second.


Big whup. What the **** does that have to do with CB, nut sniffer? You
sayin you wanna use the Rain report as your excuse to be a CB
criminal? Typical CB FAGGOT KEYCLOWN logic.