Thread
:
best type and location of antenna(s)
View Single Post
#
8
October 21st 03, 08:51 PM
lancer
Posts: n/a
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 12:59:06 -0400,
wrote:
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 18:53:01 -0700, Frank Gilliland
wrote:
In ,
wrote:
snip
At 27 MHz, any antenna shorter then 5 feet is a waste of time.
snip
Not true. There are antennas at five feet that will match or even
surpass a 102" SS whip.
Bull****.
This has been shown before. Get off your fat ass and do an actual
test. You will find that a Stainless Steel 102" whip can be marginally
beat. You can not realize this by reading a book! Get off your ass.
P.S. A 1/4 wave whip of thicker more conductive material can't be beat
by a shorter antenna, but my comment was about the common 102" SS
whip.
Using Mmana to simulate antennas;
The difference between a 5' and a 8' copper antenna is 0.3 dB
The difference between a 8' copper and 8' stainless steel antenna is
0.6 dB
(by the book) a 5' copper antenna will beat a 8' stainless antenna.
Reply With Quote