snip
Even if he doesn't, he should be able to recognize Tnom's subjectification of a
supposedly objective experiment, his inattention to detail, the lack of critical
information, and his failure (unwillingness?) to disclose his previous test and
it's contradictory results.


I have made about four or five tests. Did you want me to post a mega
message with similar results from each? What was that result?

Result = 108"SS whip can be beat by some shorter antennas


That, in my book, is sufficient to conclude that
Tnom's tests are bogus. In fact, the results of the second test are almost -too-
good, skewed out of proportion with reality -- almost like he was reading the
S-meter backwards -- and extrapolation of those results suggest that the rubber
ducky is the most efficient antenna design, second only to the theoretical dummy
load! It doesn't take an engineer to see that much.


I am still waiting for your tests parameters and results. You said you
tested antennas so let's see the results. Let's see how a self
proclaimed expert at testing antennas does it. Don't tell me you dog
chewed the tests up.