Thread
:
Blast from the past...........102 SS whip
View Single Post
#
41
October 28th 03, 02:18 AM
(Scott Unit 69)
Posts: n/a
wrote:
On 28 Oct 2003 00:24:47 GMT, Steveo
wrote:
wrote:
Ther's no misconception.
Nope. Just a bunch of hoo ha, and arguments about field strength
meter readings.
I'm gonna buy an X-terminator, and compare it in the real world
application. If it's near as good as the 108"er, I'll be happy.
Thanks for the tip. Tnom.
If you get the opportunity to swap the 108" SS with the X-Terminator
feel free to report the results. One way or the other.
I'd love to see someone else do a test. Be forewarned. If your results
are in favor of the X-Terminator you'll get flack for reporting the
results. Your test will be examined and will be deemed as being
flawed.
If your test shows the 108" SS as the superior antenna then the
obvious will happen. Your post will be accepted as legit and there
will be no argument over the results. Even though the test parameters
were the same.
It's a Catch-22 and tnom knows it because -no one- could ever duplicate tnom's
test conditions, the wooded terrain, the recieving antenna, etc. etc. so
whatever results you got won't jive with his. Lke I said, it's "keyclown
science" and not real engineering he practices.
Reply With Quote