If your test shows the 108" SS as the superior antenna then the
obvious will happen. Your post will be accepted as legit and there
will be no argument over the results. Even though the test parameters
were the same.

It's a Catch-22 and tnom knows it because -no one- could ever duplicate tnom's
test conditions, the wooded terrain, the recieving antenna, etc. etc. so
whatever results you got won't jive with his. Lke I said, it's "keyclown
science" and not real engineering he practices.

Who's science is flawed. The one who takes for granted that a 102" SS
is king, or the one who runs numerous tests with the same results to
refute it?