RadioBanter - View Single Post - Three short simple questions about antennas.

March 22nd 04, 03:26 PM

(jaroslav lipka) wrote in message . com...
(Mark Keith) wrote in message . com...

Art, Just quit all this whining.
Whine, whine, whine...Thats what gets my goat...And this whining
involved me....MK

G'day Keith
don't know where you get the idea that Art's whining
from,

Have they kept you stored in a closet? He whines about the NG, and
it's participants. He whines about his supposed lack of edjucashun. He
whines about his medical problems. He whines about antenna modeling
programs that he doesn't even own or use. He whines because no one
seems to take his antenna too seriously. He just whines....

but from the way i read his last post he write's like someone
who knows exactly what he has got, and what it will do and is
confident that when the time comes he can prove it,and to answer your
question "that" is what my money is on.

I wouldn't hold your breath. You, "or he" will die before he decides
what he has. He grabs at different straws about once every two months
trying to "explain" what he has. It's this constant straw grabbing
that attracts the attention of many.

Oh sure, he "knows" what he has, but whether what he has conforms with
reality and the laws of modern science is another thing entirely. I've
been watching him talk about the antenna for 2-3-4 years, and I still
see no indication he has ever actually built one for current use,
besides his little 160m thing, which seems somewhat unrelated to what
I modeled. He says he used to run one at some point in time....But
even making something and using it, does not automatically mean his
description of it's operation is factual. What FIRST got me to model
his "loopole" was his claim that you would see collinear gains with
this device.
That was the first thing I had to shoot down...Landed with a might
thud it did...His comments of that type ended quickly. But he won't
believe my claims that his loop/cap device is nothing but a simple
matching device. "others descriptions of linear resonator devices
non-withstanding" I'm not totally sold on that theory as far as
getting a match in itself. His views of "coupling" are very distorted
in my opinion. That why I asked him a few days ago to describe
coupling. He declined to answer...

To put it plainly far from whining i get the impression he
was telling you to "go take a jump",
Jaro.

He wants to tell nearly everyone on here to take a jump. Doesn't
bother me...MK