"George Busch" wrote in message
...
"Brainbuster" wrote in news:bqup99$4bk$2
@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk:


There is crap from both sides - some just in defence, but far too much
is goading to get a reaction.



Regards,

Peter.


And scotts reply back was exactly what you are talking about Peter. You are
at least starting to see the light, not much but at least you will admit
and yes richard you can call them trolls it is not a bad word, that is what
they are. Now mark my words, he will try to post something today or
tommorow to probve me wrong, but you Friend Landshark, when was the last
time he posted anythign Cb related. I will bet you this week there are at
least 2 post from him doing so just because I mentioned it. don't Bet me
Peter, you will lose your money if you do. It is a mortal lock. otherwise
he will continue to troll for responses from me, same with your buddies
steveo, hwe is the leg humper if doug and I and who ever else are so bad,
why do they reply? why do the contiune to troll. why do they call me
george? because they took what some deceased man said and twisted it to
make me george.

Actually George you made that post
with the sig file some month and half before
Dick Mccollum did, nice try...Insert foot
into mouth.
As for not making a CB related post?
What was this:

From: "Landshark"
Newsgroups: rec.radio.cb
References:
Subject: LOOKING FOR A SCHEMATIC FOR TRANSEL MARK 3A
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 06:50:00 -0800
Lines: 18
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165


"Reg1647" wrote in message
...
THANKS

Try he

http://www.sarrio.com/sarrio/rsman4.html

Landshark

But of course you knew that right.

Landshark


--
Try these to learn about newsgroup trolls.

http://www.io.com/~zikzak/troll_thesis.html
http://members.aol.com/intwg/trolls.htm