"Twistedhed" wrote in message
...
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 09:37:32 -0500
From: "Jacques Strappe"
Newsgroups: rec.radio.cb
References:






Subject: Palomar 300A Amp Help... Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 10:37:29
-0400 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft
Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE
V6.00.2800.1165 Message-ID: Lines:
36 NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.45.64.50 X-Trace:

sv3-kFYYIx4NS82uvuf5NH4rjFVWcTSuTTuSnb7PBwrMLZGYRuW1pU/rylF4UbLraRTlOh5cKklH
nrQPEdG!TIhRXDbQ8rEgkOdcIs5QQhntP1xSnYdAffDcMZS/qSFvfwMpGBrqEItnWtA=
X-Complaints-To: X-DMCA-Complaints-To:
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy
of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to
process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.1
"Randy" wrote in message
.. .
"Phil D. Bucket" wrote in message
...
Toll Free wrote:
Of course you do but you are a fan of illegal cb. And why
were these palomar amps never advertised in ham mags?
Again proving your nothing but a troll.
They where advertised. In most of the Ham radio magz of
yesteryear.

Toll_Free

OK if this particular Palomar amp is/was such

a popular amateur

amp why can't you discuss it on QRZ or

rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors or other

"non-CB" forum?


Duh. The original poster won't give his callsign, Skippwon't give his
callsign, and neither will you. Wonder why, LOL.


What's your call? Lead by example.


wa3moj.... who is next? perhaps you could get dickie boy cranium to give
us his next.


OOOpppss, clumsy him.........................

Landshark


--
Real heroes are men who fall and fail
and are flawed, but win out in the end
because they've stayed true to their
ideals and beliefs and commitments.