Frank Gilliland wrote in message . ..
In ,
(Richard Cranium) wrote:
Frank Gilliland wrote in message . ..
........ the only evidence which can satisfy you must come from a
bottle labelled "hand lotion".
Squirm, squirm, squirm!
You wouldn't squirm so much if you used the hand lotion.
So prove that Twist is Dave.
I did.
No you didn't. You jumped from one ASSumption to another and proved
nothing, except in your own feeble mind.
While you're at it, prove that Pat Murphy
and/or Steve Rogovich are me.
Actually, I don't care who you are because you don't say anything that peaks my
interest. Your tag-team partner TwistyDave is a little different because he's
actually a wee bit intelligent. But even if I had proof of who you are it really
doesn't matter because, just like TwistyDave does all the time, you would just
don another clown suit. It must be hard for you to mingle with real people,
having to keep all your vile attitudes hidden behind a persona created
specifically to protect them. Kinda like trying to find just the right bottle to
hide your bitterness
Sorry, Frankie, but I'm not "bitter". You must be projecting again.
Same as Georgie-girl Busch and DouGay Adair do all the time. You take
your problem(s) and see them in everyone else.
-- a bottle with kind of a generic label and no reputation,
that thankfully doesn't inspire anyone to pull the cork and pour themself a
glass of your mud. But at the same time it must be a bottle that people think
just might hold something with enough value that they don't take it out in the
field and use it for target practice. We all have something like that sitting on
our shelves. For me it's that bottle of Hi-Karate aftershave that someone gave
me for Christmas probably 30 years ago but never used. Just sitting there
collecting dust, getting older, mostly ignored......
Well that was fun, but it's time to close that cabinet for a while longer.
-PLONK-
HAHAHAHA! This is the THIRD time you've claimed to PLONK me. Last
time you admitted that you don't. Why should anyone believe you now?
So where's the proof that Twisty is someone called "Dave"? It's all
right to admit that you don't have any, of course. And multiple
ASSumptions don't make proof.