"Al Lorona" wrote in message
...

The 297 hits on Google for "radar absorbent material" was information
overload? The 3,730 hits for "RF anechoic material" frightened you? And
the
70,100 hits for "stealth aircraft design" sent you scurrying here to see
if
we had anything for you?

At least it's nice to see you doing your homework before Sunday night.

Ed
wb6wsn


Wow. Good thing Frank is a seasoned ham; had he been a newbie you would
have just chased him from ham radio. Congratulations, Elmer!

Al W6LX




Don't be an apologist for people who ask stupid or ill-phrased questions.
Don't pander to the lowest level. I provided a reply which I thought was
appropriate to the question. It was slightly sarcastic, though, by Usenet
standards, reasonably civilized. It provided three direct lines of search
for what was a very nebulous and obvious query. At no point did I attack the
poster, demean his mentality, question his civilization, or impugn the
length of his manhood.

Further, I hope your self-worth is well seasoned, or at least insulated, as
you don't seem to understand the difference between Usenet and Ham Radio.
Cranking off a dumb query on Usenet is equivalent to tuning up on a repeater
or net frequency. It's a bad use of electrons, and you can expect to be
chastised.

Perhaps I shouldn't be so harsh with you, as you can't seem to follow the
thread. If you were, you would have noticed that I provided considerable
background on RF absorbent material in a subsequent post.

Now, do YOU have anything informative to add to the subject, or are you just
trolling for sympathy? BTW, in addition to being in the dictionary,
"sympathy" yields about 3,700,000 hits on Google. Now there's a project for
your dotage.

Ed
wb6wsn