Richard Clark wrote:
On Thu, 01 Apr 2004 12:33:43 -0600, Cecil Moore
wrote:

All this is clearly shown in my references that you deleted.

None of which support your "approximation"

Uhhhhh Richard, Those graphs in the ARRL Antenna Book are the
*ORIGIN* of my approximation. Exactly what is it about those
graphs that you disagree with? It is obvious from viewing
the graphs that the maximum reactance is about 1/2 of the
maximum resistance. It is also obvious that the resistance
at the maximum reactance point is about 1/2 of the maximum
resistance. That's exactly what my approximation said.
--
73, Cecil, W5DXP



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----